[OpenSER-Users] MediaProxy or RTPProxy

[Gang Lau]

That machine only had a little traffic. It used Xeon 3GHZ to handle about
200 sessions.

But I think it is hard to handle 2,000 sessions without any tunning at P4
3GHZ. As I remember  about  70% percent  cpu is used.
But maybe new version rtpproxy has changed something.

regards,
Gang

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Pascal Maugeri <pascal.maugeri at gmail.com>
wrote:

> BTW, do you have any benchmark figures you could share with us regarding
> rtpproxy and mediaproxy performances ?
>
> The only thing I found (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Portaone+rtpproxy)
> is:
> "It should be able to handle up to 2,000 simulateneous G.729 sessions on a
> decent machine (P4 2.5-3.0 GHz)"
>
> -pascal
>
>
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Gang Lau <gangban.lau at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> yes. I tried rtpproxy and mediaproxy before. rtpproxy is more efficiency.
>> but mediaproxy is very good at cluster.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Gang
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Pezhman Lali <pezhman_lali at yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think rtpproxy, because of c programming, has more
>>> efficiency, rather than scripting(mediaproxy)
>>>
>>> --- MagoDaViola <magodaviola at ig.com.br> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Untitled Document
>>> > Hi...
>>> >
>>> > What´s the best system in performance question, to
>>> > use NAT MediaProxy or RTPProxy?
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >       Alcindo Schleder
>>> >       Sistema Processa Acessoria e Comunicações
>>> > Ltda.
>>> >
>>> >         a.. MSN: a_schleder at hotmail.com
>>> >         b.. Skipe: alcindo_schleder
>>> >       Demétrio P. dos Santos, 705 - 95670-000 -
>>> > Gramado-RS-Brasil
>>> >       Celular + 55 54 9966 7591
>>> > alcindo at processa.org
>>> >      Fone +55 54 3286-1738 comercial at processa.org
>>> >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > Users mailing list
>>> > Users at lists.openser.org
>>> >
>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at lists.openser.org
>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at lists.openser.org
>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.openser.org
> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20080525/921c012c/attachment.htm>