[Serusers] Is ser-oob.cfg compatible with 2.0 rc1?
Martin Hoffmann
hn at nvnc.de
Sat Jun 14 14:23:10 CEST 2008
x-ser at sidell.org wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:55:31 +0200, Martin Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > x-ser at sidell.org wrote:
> > > When I try to have ser check the ser-oob.cfg configuration file, I get
> > > the following errors:
> > >
> > > [root at henry ser]# ser -f /usr/local/etc/ser/ser-oob.cfg -c
> > > 0(4979) parse error (143,1-10): syntax error
> > > 0(4979) parse error (143,1-10):
> > > ERROR: bad config file (2 errors)
> >
> > Can you please also post the line in question? There is two versions of
> > ser-oob.cfg (one for 2.0 and one for CVS head aka 2.1). Both seem not to
> > have anything offending at line 143 from what I can see.
>
> Hi, Martin.
>
> I think I'm using the ser-oob.cfg from the cvs head. Below is the
> group of lines surrounding line 143. Line 143 is "phone2tel=no". The
> error occurs with a clean build of ser 2.0 rc1.
>
> Perhaps I should do what you suggest in your earlier message, and use
> a recent 2.0 daily snapshot instead.
That one should have the phone2tel core parameter. If it doesn't, you
can safely comment out the line.
Regards,
Martin
More information about the sr-users
mailing list