[Serusers] Is SER doc PSTN Gateway example incomplete/incompatible with Asterisk?

[Stefan Sayer]

Hello,

Frank Durda IV wrote:
> Feb  5 15:02:43 ser1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[1039]: DEBUG:maxfwd:is_maxfwd_present: value = 70
> Feb  5 15:02:43 ser1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[1039]: DBG:maxfwd:process_maxfwd_header: value 70 decreased to 16
> 
> This is the first unexpected behavior.  SER apparently silently overrides the hop count
> specified by the message source (70) down to 16.  Not a big deal, but in complex
> networks 16 might not be enough.  Anyway, on to what happens...
isn't that good in your case? it did not spiral 70 times until you notice...

I think the problem lies in this
> 
> Feb  5 15:02:43 ser1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[1039]: is_local(): Realm '192.168.200.30' is not local
> Feb  5 15:02:43 ser1 /usr/local/sbin/ser[1039]: is_local(): Realm '192.168.200.10' is local
is_uri_host_local() fails because you are using domain module, but have 
not added the domain 192.168.200.30 to your domain table. try serctl 
domain [show|add|rm] commands.

Stefan
-- 
Stefan Sayer
VoIP Services

stefan.sayer at iptego.com
www.iptego.com

iptego GmbH
Am Borsigturm 40
13507 Berlin
Germany

Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 101010
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Alexander Hoffmann