[Serusers] 答复: 答复: SER Version

Jiri Kuthan jiri at iptel.org
Fri Aug 29 22:01:31 CEST 2008


Steven Wu wrote:
> 
> Hi Victor,
>  
> Is it version same as the SIP proxy on Iptel.org?

HEAD version is running there.

> Actually, the situation is I'm handling a bug in my SIP UA that iptel 
> SIP proxy dropped our ACK
> in double hold case.
> Unfortunately, I can't register to public iptel SIP proxy at iptel.org 
> due to our NAT box has some problem.

what kind of?

> So, I want to install a same SIP proxy at our local networking.
> Is there any special config in SIP proxy at iptel.org?

we use somewhat modified OOB.

-jiri

>  
> Best regards,
> Steven Wu
> 
> *From:* Victor Pascual A'vila [mailto:victor.pascual.avila at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 2008-8-28 (星期四) 16:11
> *To:* Steven Wu
> *Cc:* Arun Kumar; SER Users
> *Subject:* Re: 答复: [Serusers] SER Version
> 
> 2008/8/28 Steven Wu <Steven.Wu at teleca.com>
>>
>>  Which is the up to date SER version?
> 
> Version 2.0.0: http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/2.0.0/src/ser-2.0.0_src.tar.gz
> 
> Jan also created a tag in the cvs repository. You can use the
> following command to get version 2.0.0:  cvs co -r v_2_0_0 sip_router
> 
> Cheers,
> --
> Victor Pascual A'vila
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers



More information about the sr-users mailing list