[Kamailio-Users] fr_inv_timer increased to 120 secs
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Tue Aug 12 10:51:06 CEST 2008
Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
> El Tuesday 12 August 2008 08:55:49 Klaus Darilion escribió:
>
>>> Anyway other problem will occur with the following ACK. If 2XX the ACK is
>>> a new transaction but AFAIK OpenSer matches it (in some way) to the
>>> INVITE transaction (now expired). If non 2XX then the ACK is part of the
>>> INVITE transaction so it will not delivered to the UAS because the
>>> transaction expired.
>> Indeed, ACK routing will be more difficult. 200-OK ACK should be loose
>> routed - thus no problem.
>
> Well, "no problem"? I thing it must be handled doing something as:
>
> if method == "ACK" {
> if ! t_checktran <-- Because transaction is deleted now
> lookup("location")
> ...
Basically yes, but not for in-dialog modules. Usually you first have
if (loose_route())
...
> if method == "ACK" {
> if ! t_checktran <-- Because transaction is deleted now
> lookup("location")
>
>> non-200 ACK I guess will be absorbed by tm
>> (not sure about this).
>
> How can occur tha tif transaction has been already deleted?
proxy
---INVITE--->|
|---INVITE------>
|
fr_timeout fires
wt_timer fires (now the transaction is remove from tm)
|<----180--------
<-180--------|
|<---500---------
<--500-------|
|
---ACK------>|
| ACK (if using the logic from above)
regards
klaus
More information about the sr-users
mailing list