[Kamailio-Users] poll: project name

[Helmut Kuper]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Klaus,

Of course I agree. It's a matter of time to know what Kamailio stand
for. I think Apache is a nicer name than Kamailio, but anyway: I agree
the name is mainly a question of personal taste and currently I don't
like that taste - nevertheless, I think the name should be changed to a
more handy one, just to round up the whole product.

And sure: The name won't stop telcos from using the Software rather that
project structure, roadmap and quality.


regards and peace
Helmut

Klaus Darilion schrieb:
| Helmut Kuper wrote:
|> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Hm,
|>
|> well, maybe I have to make it a bit more clear what I meant. Kamailio is
|> pronounceable in german, but it is not easy in terms of smoothyness -
|> like openser was or freeswitch is  ...
|>
|> KAMAILIO hmmm no, not with the best will in the world: I have problems
|> with it to say it without explaining what that name points to. I think
|> it is not a good name to inspire confidence. Maybe it needs a slogan to
|> explain a bit more :D
|
| IMO this is all a matter of time. Would you think that Apache is a web
| server and Eclipse is an IDE and Asterisk is an IP PBX? Me not. But now,
| if you tell one of these names to an IT guy they know what you are
| talking about. Thus, in my opinion, we just need some trust in the
| product - I do not believe the argument that telcos will use open source
| only if the name indicates open/free/SIP.... Nobody uses a product just
| because of its name.
|
| But I have to accept that others don't like name ...:-(
|
| regards
| klaus
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkihQDkACgkQ4tZeNddg3dwrJgCdENGNK/PAid+ftRtvgUFyP9hY
ZXAAoJ5ErmBLbKuxTRvp6WmWzudI1BS9
=cyPy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----