[Serusers] SER+Mediaproxy + X-LITE in the same LAN.

[Fredrik Lundmark]

    Check the "Firewall Traversal-setting (STUN, ICE, rport, outbound proxy 
etc.) in your xlite-clients. As I understand it, the MediaProxy (module + 
server) is a network/server-side NAT-solution, xlite has a lot of 
"client-side" NAT-traversal - they can be "in conflict".

And as both your servers and clients are on private IP-addresses - if either 
xlite presents a public address (obtained using STUN?), that could be the 
problem.

/Fredrik

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <pistara_bros at tin.it>
To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 11:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER+Mediaproxy + X-LITE in the same LAN.


> Bon jour à tout le monde,
>
> I have other news about my investigation on
> Mediaproxy and SER in the same Lan.
> In the first test i used X-lite, as
> UA clients,
> running on windowsXP and i saw that RTP traffic
> didn't
> pass through MEDIAproxy (IP 192.168.123.186).
> Now i'm using the client
> "Express Talk" runnig on
> windows XP (IP 192.168.123.168)
> and X-lite
> runnig on windows XP (IP 192.168.123.10)
> and I see that MEDIAproxy work
> correctly because
> works as "man in the middle" and proxies the
> RTP
> packets between two clients.
> Seems that it's necessary that one of
> two
> clients must be Express Talk, in order
> to Mediaproxy work correctly.
> I observe that,
> if one client is Express Talk,
> the second client
> could be X-lite or Yate or
> TiVi (http://m.tivi.com/)
> and MediaProxy
> work OK.
>
> But why Mediaproxy work correctly only
> if i use "Express
> Talk" as one peer client??
> Any ideas?
>
> Target clients for my
> operational environment will be
> TiVi (http://m.tivi.com/) and i want
> that using them
> the RTP packet pass through Mediaproxy.
> There's anyone
> (sherlock holmes) in the forum that
> could solve the mystery?
> thanks a
> lot.
>
>>Hi all, i'm newbie in SER,
>>I want to route RTP packets between
> 2
>>computers with x-lite client voip
>>in the same network through
>>Mediaproxy. I know this may have
>>no sense, but it's just a test
>>configuration.
>>The call use_media_proxy() seems to have no effect,
>>the RTP packets go directly from one computer to
>>another, no packet
> trough Mediaproxy.
>>This is my environment:
>>SER and Mediaproxy on the
> same PC
>>(192.168.123.186)
>>X-lite client_A running on 192.168.123.10
>>X-lite
>>client_B running on 192.168.123.168
>>Client_A call Client_B
> that accept,
>>but mediaproxy refuses to
>>proxy the call.
>>Is
> mediaproxy
>>working just between different networks
>>or it's an error
> in my
>>configuration file?
>>Please help me. Any suggestions?
>>Orazio
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>