[Serusers] WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used and ERROR: init_tcpudp_sock: bind: Address already in use [98]
Frank Wang
frank2336 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 13 05:03:39 CEST 2007
Sorry I didn't see ser.cfg file carefully, we can also changed the default
port value in the file.
# listen on tcp, localhost, 2049 is the ctl and sercmd default port
modparam("ctl", "binrpc", "tcp:127.0.0.1:2049")
Best Regards,
Frank
2007/9/13, Frank Wang <frank2336 at gmail.com>:
>
> Jiri Kuthan,
>
> Thanks for your help, I found the problem reason according your analysis.
>
> First I modified the debug level in ser.cfg
>
> # Debug level on logging
> debug=4
> # Fork and create children (no=run single process for debugging purposes)
>
> fork=no
>
> # Log to stderr (only use this of fork=no)
>
> log_stderror=yes
>
> And running SER again, and get the follow messages:
>
> 0(10768) qm_malloc(0x5e0b20, 9) called from xl_lib.c: xl_mod_init(1649)
>
> 0(10768) qm_malloc(0x5e0b20, 16) returns address 0x61dcd0 frag. 0x61dca0
> (size=56) on 1 -th hit
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
>
> 0(10768) qm_free(0x5e0b20, 0x61db30), called from xl_lib.c:
> xl_mod_init(1667)
>
> 0(10768) qm_free: freeing frag. 0x61db00 alloc'ed from xl_lib.c:
> xl_mod_init(1628)
>
> 0(10768) Hostname: sipmcu
>
> 0(10768) Domainname: leadtek.com.cn
>
> 0(10768) Fullname: sipmcu.leadtek.com.cn
>
> 0(10768) IPaddr: 10.0.0.21
>
> 0(10768) DEBUG: init_mod: ctl
>
> 0(10768) listening on:
>
> 0(10768) [binrpc:tcp] 127.0.0.1:2049
>
> 0(10768) [fifo:fifo] /tmp/ser_fifo
>
> 0(10768) [binrpc:unix stream] /tmp/ser_ctl
>
> 0(10768) ERROR: init_tcpudp_sock: bind: Address already in use [98]
>
> 0(10768) ERROR: ctl: mod_init: init ctrl. sockets failed
>
> 0(10768) init_mod(): Error while initializing module ctl
>
> ERROR: error while initializing modules
>
> 0(10768) qm_free(0x5e0b20, 0x617d98), called from sr_module.c:
> destroy_modules(393)
>
> the 2049 port that Ser want to use is used by NFS. As described In
> /etc/services:
>
> nfs 2049/tcp nfsd
> nfs 2049/udp nfsd
>
> And the NFS service is running on my machine too.
>
> After stopped NFS and running SER again, It seemed OK.
> [frank at sipmcu ser]$ ../../sbin/ser -f ser.cfg
> Listening on
> udp: 10.0.0.21 [10.0.0.21 ]:5060
> tcp: 10.0.0.21 [10.0.0.21]:5060
> Aliases:
> tcp: sipmcu.mydomain.com.cn:5060
> udp: sipmcu.mydomain.com.cn:5060
> *: mytestser.org:*
>
> WARNING: no fork mode
> 0(10945) init_tcp: using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected)
> 0(10945) Maxfwd module- initializing
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP 10.0.0.21 not used
> 0(10945) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 135168
> 0(10945) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142
>
>
> So if can SER change binrpc:tcp port to another value to avoid conflict
> with NFS port?
>
> Best Regards,
> Frank
>
> 2007/9/12, Jiri Kuthan <jiri at iptel.org>:
> >
> >
> >
> > At 11:55 12/09/2007, Frank Wang wrote:
> > >I downloaded ser 2.0.0-rc1 source code from <
> > http://www.iptel.org/ser_2_0_0_release_candidate_1>http://www.iptel.org/ser_2_0_0_release_candidate_1and install on my Linux step by step according the tutorial on the WEB.
> > >
> > >When I running SER, I got follow messages:
> > >
> > >[root at sipmcu ser]# ../../sbin/ser -f ser.cfg
> > >Listening on
> > > udp: <http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21 [<http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21
> > ]:5060
> > > tcp: <http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21 [<http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21
> > ]:5060
> > >Aliases:
> > > tcp: <http://sipmcu.leadtek.com.cn:5060>
> > sipmcu.leadtek.com.cn:5060
> > > udp: <http://sipmcu.leadtek.com.cn:5060>
> > sipmcu.leadtek.com.cn:5060
> > > *: mytestser.org:*
> > >
> > >WARNING: no fork mode
> > > 0(3078) init_tcp: using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto
> > detected)
> > > 0(3078) Maxfwd module- initializing
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP < http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> >
> > unimportant. (I checked the code and I was a bit puzzled by it, but it
> > really
> > shold not matter much.)
> >
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP < http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP <http://10.0.0.21> 10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP <http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP < http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP <http://10.0.0.21> 10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP <http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP < http://10.0.0.21>10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> > > 0(3078) WARNING: xl_mod_init: more IP <http://10.0.0.21> 10.0.0.21 not
> > used
> > > 0(3078) ERROR: init_tcpudp_sock: bind: Address already in use [98]
> >
> > This is the problem. Maybe you have a SER instance running from the last
> > time and you are starting
> > the script again, for which reason SER can't be restarted -- it can't
> > claim the same port number
> > twice.
> >
> > > 0(3078) ERROR: ctl: mod_init: init ctrl. sockets failed
> > > 0(3078) init_mod(): Error while initializing module ctl
> > >ERROR: error while initializing modules
> >
> > This could have same reason.
> >
> > >
> > >could anybody tell me how about it? Thanks a lot.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Frank
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Serusers mailing list
> > > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/<http://iptel.org/%7Ejiri/>
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20070913/f0372578/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list