[OpenSER-Users] record_route_preset("x.x.x.x:5060; nat=yes"); and search("^Route:.*; nat=yes")
Halomoan Chow
halomoan at gmail.com
Fri Sep 14 11:09:29 CEST 2007
Hi Bodan
I understand your explaination for loose_route(). but you said it will
check all Route hdrs? I thought it should only check 1 line at a time,
so remove only the Route hdrs that belong to it, right?
I think to fully understand openser, you got to have a complete sample
message of SIP in different dialog/session and in different condition
:)
Halomoan
On 9/14/07, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
> Hi Halomoan,
>
> loose_route() only marks the Route hdr to be deleted when the message is
> sent out (it does not actually delete the hdr). So, the search after
> loose_route() should work, but it look a bit broken to me, as it will
> check all the Route hdrs and not only the one belonging to the server.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Halomoan Chow wrote:
> > I copy and paste the logic example generated from sipwise below.
> > I can see for first request, it marked the sender is behind nat with
> > record_route(";nat=yes")
> >
> > In the loose route block, it tries to identify sender if they are
> > behind nat with search("^Route:.*;nat=yes").
> >
> > In one sip proxy architecture, after you enter loose_route() function,
> > the Via with ;nat has gone, right? and the search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")
> > test would always return false.
> > Please correct me if i'm wrong. Thank you.
> >
> >
> > if(!is_method("REGISTER"))
> > {
> > if(nat_uac_test("19"))
> > {
> > record_route(";nat=yes");
> > }
> > else
> > {
> > record_route();
> > }
> > }
> > if(is_method("CANCEL") || is_method("BYE"))
> > {
> > end_media_session();
> > }
> >
> > if(loose_route())
> > {
> > if(!has_totag())
> > {
> >
> > xlog("L_INFO", "Initial loose-routing rejected
> > - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
> > sl_send_reply("403", "Initial Loose-Routing
> > Rejected");
> > exit;
> > }
> > if(nat_uac_test("19") || search("^Route:.*;nat=yes"))
> > {
> > fix_nated_contact();
> > setbflag(6);
> > }
> >
> > route(3);
> > }
> >
> >
> > On 9/12/07, *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu* <bogdan at voice-system.ro
> > <mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Halomoan,
> >
> > Mainly because the NAT detection on SIP replied is very poor - you can
> > check only if the contact address is a private one or not. The
> > other nat
> > test are not applicable for replies (but only for requests).
> >
> > Anthow, when you process the request, you learn that the calee is
> > behind
> > NAT, so you can simple remember this (in RR) than detecting it
> > each time
> > when receiving a reply.
> >
> > regards,
> > bogdan
> >
> > Halomoan Chow wrote:
> > > Dear All
> > >
> > > I don't understand why in the Openser+MediaProxy i need
> > > record_route_preset("x.x.x.x:5060;nat=yes"); and
> > > search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")
> > > What is the purpose while I can do client_nat_test to see if the
> > > request is come from a nat-ed client.
> > >
> > > If I remove search("^Route:.*;nat=yes") from below statement, I
> > can do
> > > re-INVITE without any problem because it still have
> > client_nat_test to
> > > find out the nat in between.
> > >
> > > if (client_nat_test("3") || search("^Route:.*;nat=yes")) {
> > > setbflag(6);
> > > use_media_proxy();
> > > };
> > >
> > >
> > > Hope someone can give me a clue.
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Halomoan
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users at openser.org <mailto:Users at openser.org>
> > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list