[Serusers] ser 0.9.6 memory problems

[Arun Kumar]

increase your shared memory during compile or run ser with -m option

On 10/31/07, Mitya <mitya at madein.hu> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a SER 0.9.6, and sometimes I have memory allocation problem
> somehow :(
>
>
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: processing REGISTER received from x.x.x.x
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=23950 , global
> msg id=23949 , T on entrance=0xffffffff
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: parse_headers: flags=-1
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: found end of header
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: parse_headers: flags=60
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: t_lookup_request: start searching:
> hash=31874, isACK=0
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction
> found
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate
> memory
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list
> (nil)
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: ERROR: new_t: out of mem:
> Oct 29 19:58:38 sip ser[23161]: ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
>
>
> As I read in the mailing lists, it occurs, when SER has a lots of live,
> opened transactions.
>
> It's a test SER, I think we did not have any opened transactions (maybe
> the failed ones).
>
> Is there any mechanism in SER, what drops the too old opened (most
> likely failed transactions) transactions ?
>
> Can I get the current used shared memory somehow ?
>
> What else can sause this problem ?
>
> Thanks,
> Mitya
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20071031/1f8e6be6/attachment.htm>