[Serusers] Implicit Registration Set

[Jiri Kuthan]

p.s. which may be good enough. we know from interop events that having multiple contacts
with only one actual registration has actually caused some interop issues. anyhow -- it
depends on what your use case is, some of these things -- should they pay off -- are
scriptable.

At 23:01 21/11/2007, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
>It will return one contact. -jiri
>
>At 07:44 21/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote:
>>OK, but using alias, will that give me back both contacts in the 200 OK for a Register (unfortunately I don't have the possibility to try this right now)?
>>
>>  /Magnus
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org] 
>>Sent: den 15 november 2007 15:00
>>To: Magnus Sörman; serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implicit Registration Set
>>
>>well it depends -- doing what you are suggesting literally is quite tricky and I'm not sure this IMS feature is worth the effort. IF you would like to register and be then available under all of your aliases (both "that address"
>>and "his tel-uri"), you can easily use aliases.
>>
>>-jiri
>>
>>At 14:52 15/11/2007, Magnus Sörman wrote:
>>>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>>        boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8278E.D8F42EB4"
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>How do you/could you configure SER to use implicit registration set? 
>>>If e.g. a user with a sip URI registers, then both that address and his tel-uri should be registered. 
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>  /Magnus Sorman
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>
>
>
>--
>Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/



--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/