[Serusers] R: R: R: Loadbalancing for interco

[Jiri Kuthan]

At 18:48 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
>Yes, it seems really strange also to me.
>
>I've tried with both SER-0.9.6 and OpenSER-1.2.2 on a Gentoo-linux
>And in both cases there is the same problem...
>
>Do you think that can be a problem of installation/compiling?
>Have ever heard something like that?

Not really :-(
Calling forward can't change contacts -- perhaps you are mistakenly
starting SER with other config file than you think?

-jiri


>-Stefano
>
>> -----Messaggio originale-----
>> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org]
>> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 18.28
>> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] R: R: Loadbalancing for interco
>> 
>> I think there is some confusion here ... SER doesn't change contacts by
>> the action referred to
>> bellow.
>> 
>> -jiri
>> 
>> At 17:54 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
>> >It is the simplest ser.cfg you can imagine:
>> >
>> >        Route {
>> >                forward(z.z.z.z,5060);
>> >        }
>> >
>> >
>> >The message enter in SER (y.y.y.y) as:
>> >
>> >        U x.x.x.x:5060 -> y.y.y.y:5060
>> >        REGISTER sip:213.203.128.126 SIP/2.0.
>> >        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> x.x.x.x:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKFCDF5014775145F7BBFB33B621BC8BC0.
>> >        From: openser <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y>;tag=1540538748.
>> >        To: openser <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y>.
>> >        Contact: "openser" <sip:123456102 at x.x.x.x:5060>.
>> >        Call-ID: 23FDB6F533AC4BCF840FD35F34B385FD at y.y.y.y.
>> >        CSeq: 60558 REGISTER.
>> >        Expires: 120.
>> >        Max-Forwards: 70.
>> >        User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m.
>> >        Content-Length: 0.
>> >
>> >And goes out as:
>> >
>> >        U y.y.y.y:5060 -> z.z.z.z:5060
>> >        REGISTER sip:y.y.y.y SIP/2.0.
>> >        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP y.y.y.y:5060;branch=0.
>> >        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>> 195.110.129.41:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKFCDF5014775145F7BBFB33B621BC8
>> BC0.
>> >        From: openser <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y>;tag=1540538748.
>> >        To: openser <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y>.
>> >        Contact: "openser" <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y:5060>.
>> >        Call-ID: 23FDB6F533AC4BCF840FD35F34B385FD at y.y.y.y.
>> >        CSeq: 60558 REGISTER.
>> >        Expires: 120.
>> >        Max-Forwards: 70.
>> >        User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m.
>> >        Content-Length: 0.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> -----Messaggio originale-----
>> >> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org]
>> >> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.41
>> >> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] R: Loadbalancing for interco
>> >>
>> >> I haven't seen your config file, but normally it does not change
>> Contacts.
>> >> It changes contacts if it is configured to deal with NATs.
>> >>
>> >> -jiri
>> >>
>> >> At 17:20 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
>> >> >Ok, thanks for your answer, I understand your position.
>> >> >
>> >> >Anyway I cannot understand why SER modify the Contact header without
>> any
>> >> instruction about that in the config file...is there any reason
>> concerning
>> >> RFC compliance?
>> >> >
>> >> >Best regards,
>> >> >Stefano
>> >> >
>> >> >> -----Messaggio originale-----
>> >> >> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org]
>> >> >> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.09
>> >> >> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >> >> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] Loadbalancing for interco
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Well, load-balancing is not easy. To deal with issues like you are
>> >> >> describing,
>> >> >> your best choice is a load-balancer which is capable of working in
>> >> >> transparent
>> >> >> mode. We have such in our intelligence, some work, some less so, let
>> me
>> >> >> know
>> >> >> if you need some intelligence on this.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -jiri
>> >> >>
>> >> >> At 12:23 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
>> >> >> >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>> >> >> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> >> >> >        boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8251E.664EA61A"
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >we are trying to do the same with our servers but we have some
>> problem
>> >> >> with registrations:
>> >> >> >it seem that when the REGISTER message pass through SER, the host-
>> part
>> >> of
>> >> >> Contact field is modified with the local address of SER.
>> >> >> >Is it a misconfiguration problem?
>> >> >> >Do you have experience in balancing also the registrations?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >> >Stefano
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Is there a way to have something like a loadbalancing on SER for
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> outgoing calls ?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> I want to distribute the calls between two gateways. Ideally,
>> with a
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> coefficient (ie. 60% for the first and 40% for the second).
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Thanks for your support.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Adrien .L
>> >> >> >_______________________________________________
>> >> >> >Serusers mailing list
>> >> >> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >> >> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>> >> >_______________________________________________
>> >> >Serusers mailing list
>> >> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Serusers mailing list
>> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers



--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/