[Serusers] R: R: Loadbalancing for interco

[Jiri Kuthan]

I think there is some confusion here ... SER doesn't change contacts by the action referred to
bellow.

-jiri

At 17:54 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
>It is the simplest ser.cfg you can imagine:
>
>        Route {
>                forward(z.z.z.z,5060);
>        }
>
>
>The message enter in SER (y.y.y.y) as:
>
>        U x.x.x.x:5060 -> y.y.y.y:5060
>        REGISTER sip:213.203.128.126 SIP/2.0.
>        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP        x.x.x.x:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKFCDF5014775145F7BBFB33B621BC8BC0.
>        From: openser <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y>;tag=1540538748.
>        To: openser <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y>.
>        Contact: "openser" <sip:123456102 at x.x.x.x:5060>.
>        Call-ID: 23FDB6F533AC4BCF840FD35F34B385FD at y.y.y.y.
>        CSeq: 60558 REGISTER.
>        Expires: 120.
>        Max-Forwards: 70.
>        User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m.
>        Content-Length: 0.
>
>And goes out as:
>
>        U y.y.y.y:5060 -> z.z.z.z:5060
>        REGISTER sip:y.y.y.y SIP/2.0.
>        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP y.y.y.y:5060;branch=0.
>        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP        195.110.129.41:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKFCDF5014775145F7BBFB33B621BC8BC0.
>        From: openser <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y>;tag=1540538748.
>        To: openser <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y>.
>        Contact: "openser" <sip:123456102 at y.y.y.y:5060>.
>        Call-ID: 23FDB6F533AC4BCF840FD35F34B385FD at y.y.y.y.
>        CSeq: 60558 REGISTER.
>        Expires: 120.
>        Max-Forwards: 70.
>        User-Agent: X-Lite release 1103m.
>        Content-Length: 0.
>
>
>
>> -----Messaggio originale-----
>> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org]
>> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.41
>> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] R: Loadbalancing for interco
>> 
>> I haven't seen your config file, but normally it does not change Contacts.
>> It changes contacts if it is configured to deal with NATs.
>> 
>> -jiri
>> 
>> At 17:20 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
>> >Ok, thanks for your answer, I understand your position.
>> >
>> >Anyway I cannot understand why SER modify the Contact header without any
>> instruction about that in the config file...is there any reason concerning
>> RFC compliance?
>> >
>> >Best regards,
>> >Stefano
>> >
>> >> -----Messaggio originale-----
>> >> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org]
>> >> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.09
>> >> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] Loadbalancing for interco
>> >>
>> >> Well, load-balancing is not easy. To deal with issues like you are
>> >> describing,
>> >> your best choice is a load-balancer which is capable of working in
>> >> transparent
>> >> mode. We have such in our intelligence, some work, some less so, let me
>> >> know
>> >> if you need some intelligence on this.
>> >>
>> >> -jiri
>> >>
>> >> At 12:23 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
>> >> >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>> >> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> >> >        boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8251E.664EA61A"
>> >> >
>> >> >Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> >we are trying to do the same with our servers but we have some problem
>> >> with registrations:
>> >> >it seem that when the REGISTER message pass through SER, the host-part
>> of
>> >> Contact field is modified with the local address of SER.
>> >> >Is it a misconfiguration problem?
>> >> >Do you have experience in balancing also the registrations?
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >Stefano
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> Is there a way to have something like a loadbalancing on SER for
>> >> >
>> >> >> outgoing calls ?
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> I want to distribute the calls between two gateways. Ideally, with a
>> >> >
>> >> >> coefficient (ie. 60% for the first and 40% for the second).
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> Thanks for your support.
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >> Adrien .L
>> >> >_______________________________________________
>> >> >Serusers mailing list
>> >> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Serusers mailing list
>> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers



--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/