[Serusers] R: Loadbalancing for interco

[Stefano Capitanio]

Ok, thanks for your answer, I understand your position.

Anyway I cannot understand why SER modify the Contact header without any instruction about that in the config file...is there any reason concerning RFC compliance?

Best regards,
Stefano

> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri at iptel.org]
> Inviato: lunedì 12 novembre 2007 17.09
> A: Stefano Capitanio; serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Oggetto: Re: [Serusers] Loadbalancing for interco
> 
> Well, load-balancing is not easy. To deal with issues like you are
> describing,
> your best choice is a load-balancer which is capable of working in
> transparent
> mode. We have such in our intelligence, some work, some less so, let me
> know
> if you need some intelligence on this.
> 
> -jiri
> 
> At 12:23 12/11/2007, Stefano Capitanio wrote:
> >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
> >Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >        boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8251E.664EA61A"
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >we are trying to do the same with our servers but we have some problem
> with registrations:
> >it seem that when the REGISTER message pass through SER, the host-part of
> Contact field is modified with the local address of SER.
> >Is it a misconfiguration problem?
> >Do you have experience in balancing also the registrations?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Stefano
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, inge wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >
> >>
> >
> >> Is there a way to have something like a loadbalancing on SER for
> >
> >> outgoing calls ?
> >
> >>
> >
> >> I want to distribute the calls between two gateways. Ideally, with a
> >
> >> coefficient (ie. 60% for the first and 40% for the second).
> >
> >>
> >
> >> Thanks for your support.
> >
> >>
> >
> >> Adrien .L
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/