[Serusers] SER rel 2_0_0 - Errors in msilo module

[Vaclav Kubart]

I have created the bug report and I will correct it.

	Vaclav

On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Michal Matyska wrote:
> You can try apply patch like this:
> diff -r f576f4aff98e modules/msilo/msilo.c
> --- a/modules/msilo/msilo.c     Mon May 14 15:28:46 2007 +0200
> +++ b/modules/msilo/msilo.c     Mon May 14 17:22:27 2007 +0200
> @@ -325,9 +325,9 @@ static int m_store(struct sip_msg* msg, 
>                 goto error;
>         }
>         mode = str1[0] - '0';
> -       if (str2) {
> +       next_hop.len = strlen(str2);
> +       if (next_hop.len) {
>                 next_hop.s = str2;
> -               next_hop.len = strlen(str2);
>         }
>  
>         if (get_to_uid(&uid, msg) < 0) {
> 
> And please fill bug report at tracker.
> Michal
> 
> On Po, 2007-05-14 at 15:35 +0200, tzieleniewski wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > When I try to store message in the database I get the following errors in the syslog (There are no messages stored in the database):
> > 
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0)
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri:
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
> > 
> > And here is ser.cfg:
> > xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, )) \n");
> > if (m_store ("0", ""))
> > {
> >   xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: offline message stored \n");
> >   xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted) \n");
> >   if (!t_reply("202", "Accepted"))
> >   {
> >    xlog("L_INFO", " route[INBOUND]: sl_reply_error() \n");
> >    sl_reply_error();
> >   }
> > }
> > 
> > the error appears in the following place accordin to my logging:
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]:  route[INBOUND]: (m_store (0, ))
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: parse_uri: uri too short: <> (0)
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri:
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]: t_uac: no socket found
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]:  route[INBOUND]: offline message stored
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]:  route[INBOUND]: (!t_reply(202,Accepted)
> > May 14 15:26:40 sen ser[5853]:  route[INBOUND]: drop <MESSAGE> <sip:hulk at voip.rd.touk.pl>
> > 
> > Below is the Message transaction sent through SER:
> > 
> > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.746835 192.168.0.165:7089 -> 192.168.0.165:5060
> > MESSAGE sip:hulk at voip.rd.touk.pl SIP/2.0.
> > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE.
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport.
> > From: "Sen" <sip:sen at voip.rd.touk.pl>;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e.
> > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e at sen.
> > To: "hulk@" <sip:hulk at voip.rd.touk.pl>.
> > Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,REFER,MESSAGE.
> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8.
> > Content-Length: 12.
> > Max-Forwards: 70.
> > .
> > test message
> > #
> > U 2007/05/14 15:26:40.790793 192.168.0.165:5060 -> 192.168.0.165:7089
> > SIP/2.0 202 Accepted.
> > CSeq: 64 MESSAGE.
> > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.165:7089;branch=z9hG4bK24d4276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e;rport=7089.
> > From: "Sen" <sip:sen at voip.rd.touk.pl>;tag=a0d0276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e.
> > Call-ID: 32c6276b-8c00-dc11-982b-00148539376e at sen.
> > To: "hulk@" <sip:hulk at voip.rd.touk.pl>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-fd05.
> > Server: Sip EXpress router (2.0.0-rc1 (x86_64/linux)).
> > Content-Length: 0.
> > Warning: 392 192.168.0.165:5060 "Noisy feedback tells:  pid=5853 req_src_ip=192.168.0.165 req_src_port=7089 in_uri=sip:hulk at voip.rd.touk.pl out_uri=sip:hulk at voip.rd.touk.pl via_cnt==1".
> > .
> > 
> > Thanks for any feedback!
> > Cheers
> > Tomasz
> > 
> >  
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers