[Serusers] Fwd: record_route..........TCP ??

Michal Matyska michal at iptel.org
Fri May 4 12:14:44 CEST 2007


Hi Kumar,

could you please attach also the capture (at the server is enough) of
the UDP both way messages? There call flow is quite strange and not
understandable....  (well not surprised that's M$ RTC :)

Some comments for now:
1) it seems the CLIENT IS BROKEN and does not understand lr=on flag for
loose routing - see how is the ACK generated !!! You can try change rr
module parameter to put just lr into the record-route (this might
explain your rr and rr_preset difference)

2) M$ is used to misuse maddr, there is compile time flag HONOR_MADDR
which you should have set to route such requests taking maddr into
account

Michal


On Pá, 2007-05-04 at 09:52 +0545, KUMAR wrote:
> Here are the packet captures. I was not quite sure whether I have to
> include packet captures from server or the UAs so i've included all of
> them. ua_A is sending INVITE to ua_B.
> thank you
> 
> regards
> kumar
> 
> On 5/3/07, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Jiri Kuthan wrote:
> > > actually I was suggesting SIP message dump (PCAP file) as opposed to log files. -jiri
> >
> > or ngrep dump:
> >
> >    ngrep -t -W byline -d any port 5060
> >
> > regards
> > klaus
> >
> >
> > >
> > > At 13:10 03/05/2007, KUMAR wrote:
> > >> Here is the message dump that i get when using TCP as transport.
> > >>>
> > >>> On 5/3/07, Jiri Kuthan <jiri at iptel.org> wrote:
> > >>>> I think you would have to send message dumps first so that [serusers] volunteers
> > >>>> have material for providing an answer.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -jiri
> > >>>>
> > >>>> At 12:07 03/05/2007, KUMAR wrote:
> > >>>>> -
> > >>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>> I already posted this message yet havent got any replies. I really
> > >>>>> need to find this out.
> > >>>>> Please anyone reply to this problem.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I am using SER-0.9.6 and the problem i'm having is this. When using
> > >>>>> the following ser.cfg, it works well when the transport UDP is used.
> > >>>>> But when transport TCP is used, then it only results in one way IM,
> > >>>>> only from the UA from which the INVITE is being sent. Moreover, when
> > >>>>> record_route is used instead of record_route_preset, then even that
> > >>>>> one way IM doesn't work. But it works well with UDP.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Can anyone please point me as to where the problem might be??
> > >>>>> Thank you in advance.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> kumar
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=ser.cfg
> > >>>>> X-Attachment-Id: f_f18sg2bl
> > >>>>> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ser.cfg"
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> Serusers mailing list
> > >>>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > >>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >> Content-Type: audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin; name="msg_dump.rar"
> > >> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="msg_dump.rar"
> > >> X-Attachment-Id: f_f1949112
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Serusers mailing list
> > >> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers




More information about the sr-users mailing list