[Users] BYE relay issue

[kaiser]

Hi,

Thanks for your help, this is the invite from initial proxy:


sip:0908900000 at sip.ipox.org.tw:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:1.2.3.4:5060;nat=yes;ftag=ooqjvbi7ql;lr=on>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4;branch=z9hG4bK2e5a.835198e5.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
192.168.0.12:2051;received=59.120.208.208;branch=z9hG4bK- 
kblxgjx7vsj6;rport=2051
From: "0909802020 kl" <sip:0709802020 at sip.edu.tw>;tag=ooqjvbi7ql
To: <sip:0908900000 at sip.edu.tw;user=phone>
Call-ID: 3c275da915f9-iylvmp2wjuh0 at snom360-00041323058B
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 69
Contact: <sip:0909802020 at 59.120.208.208:2051;line=5bj76qg6>;flow-id=1


do you mean we have to add username in record_route?

best regards
kaiser




在 2007/5/22 上午 1:21 時，Klaus Darilion 寫到：

> Hi!
>
> AS this is probably a loose-route problem you have to provide a log  
> of the initial INVITE too.
>
> regards
> klaus
>
> kaiser wrote:
>> Dear sir,
>> We install 3 openser 1.1.0 in public internet, and we find a BYE  
>> relay issue to caller SIP UA.
>>   UA(a)-------Proxy1 --------Proxy2 ----Proxy 3 ---------UA(b)
>> We make call from UA(a) to UA (b), if UA(b) send Bye first, UA(a)  
>> can not get Bye.
>> The packet is from Proxy2 to Proxy1 as following
>> BYE sip:1.2.3.4:5060;nat=yes;ftag=ooqjvbi7ql;lr=on SIP/2.0
>> Record-Route: <sip:5.6.7.8;lr=on;ftag=as1b41fbeb>
>> Record-Route: <sip:5.6.7.8;lr=on;ftag=as1b41fbeb>
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 5.6.7.8;branch=z9hG4bKc74c.bd89ce13.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 5.6.7.8;branch=z9hG4bKc74c.ad89ce13.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 100.200.100.200;branch=z9hG4bKc74c.321ef5e3.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
>> 100.200.100.199:5060;branch=z9hG4bK75e8d6f3;rport=5060
>> From: <sip:0908900000 at sip.edu.tw;user=phone>;tag=as1b41fbeb
>> To: "0909802020 kl" <sip:0909802020 at sip.edu.tw>;tag=ooqjvbi7ql
>> Call-ID: 3c275da915f9-iylvmp2wjuh0 at snom360-00041323058B
>> CSeq: 102 BYE
>> User-Agent: Gentrice_IPPBX
>> Max-Forwards: 67
>> Content-Length: 0
>> Then bye is looping in proxy1.
>> BYE sip:1.2.3.4:5060;nat=yes;ftag=ooqjvbi7ql;lr=on SIP/2.0
>> Record-Route: <sip:5.6.7.8;lr=on;ftag=as1b41fbeb>
>> Record-Route: <sip:5.6.7.8;lr=on;ftag=as1b41fbeb>
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4;branch=z9hG4bKc74c.1714a4e7.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 5.6.7.8;branch=z9hG4bKc74c.bd89ce13.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 5.6.7.8;branch=z9hG4bKc74c.ad89ce13.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 100.200.100.200;branch=z9hG4bKc74c.321ef5e3.0
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP  
>> 100.200.100.199:5060;branch=z9hG4bK75e8d6f3;rport=5060
>> From: <sip:0908900000 at sip.edu.tw;user=phone>;tag=as1b41fbeb
>> To: "0909802020 kl" <sip:0909802020 at sip.edu.tw>;tag=ooqjvbi7ql
>> Call-ID: 3c275da915f9-iylvmp2wjuh0 at snom360-00041323058B
>> CSeq: 102 BYE
>> User-Agent: Gentrice_IPPBX
>> Max-Forwards: 66
>> Content-Length: 0
>> We used to use default script for proxy1, but the same...
>> And we do record_route, loose_route relay as well.
>> Anyone know what happen?
>> best regards
>> Thrli
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users