[Serusers] Error 483 response to ACK and BYE
Andres
andres at telesip.net
Thu Jun 28 18:04:34 CEST 2007
SIP wrote:
> setflag(3); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); };
>}
>
>But for some reason, it sends it to itself... and moments later, I end up with something like:
>U 63.64.65.66:5060 -> 63.64.65.66:5060ACK sip:201 at 63.64.65.66:5060 SIP/2.0.Record-Route:
>
Your ACK is going to the wrong port. If you say SEMS is on 5090 then
the remote end is not sending the ACK to the correct port. You will
need to take a look at the whole SIP message exchange to see if its your
fault or the other providers fault.
>So what do you think? Any ideas on what might cause different routing behaviour for locally-registered and non-locally-registered UAs? Would taking the approach of tossing all the rewrites into a separate routing block and calling it from the ACK, CANCEL, BYE, and INVITE blocks be just heading down the wrong path?
>
>
>
Yes, and again a complete comparison of SIP messages in both test cases
will reveal why. Look at the contact header throughout all messages to
see what happens. The non-locally-registered UAs are sending the ACK to
the wrong port.
Andres
http://www.telesip.net
More information about the sr-users
mailing list