[Serusers] tm matching forked replies with received parameter in branch

[Greger V. Teigre]

Maybe you can describe in a bit more detail the situation where SER is 
supposed to CANCEL the other branches, but does not?
g-)

samuel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just a question about transaction matching in SER 0.9.7:
>
> In a forked request, SER receives a reply with a ;received=IP 
> parameter after the branch parameter in the Via header and I don't 
> know if this can affect parallel forking because it does not CANCEL 
> the other branches....
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Samuel.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20070622/ddc0e908/attachment.htm>