[Serusers] NAT Problem with PAP2

[Nhadie]

hi,

i did not, as i thought it didn't it because it was registering as a 
public IP already. i will try that. thanks

regards,
nhadie

Eneref wrote:
> Do you have STUN support enabled on the PAP2?
>
> N.
>
>
> Nhadie wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>> I'm testing the default of config of ser, and just adding some 
>> nathelper command to make it 2 UA's work, I have an x-lite and a PAP2 
>> both are behind nat.
>>
>> X-lite is being detected by ser as behind NAT, but the PAP2 isn't, 
>> the ser thinks the PAP2 is registering with public IP.
>>
>> When I call from PAP2 to X-lite, i have no problem, because the c= IN 
>> on the SIP/200 OK reply is already public IP, so wehen PAP2 sends an 
>> ACK or BYE it sends it the c=IN of X-lite which is public IP.
>>
>> But when I call vice versa, that PAP send c=IN as private IP so when 
>> X-lite sends an ACK/BYE, it wil send it to the private IP. which 
>> obviously will not be able to be recieved by PAP2.
>>
>> How can I fix this? Another thing i don't get is that why PAP2 
>> registers as not behind NAT, but when it replies to messages, it is 
>> sending the private IP on the c= IN.
>>
>> Anyone experienced this before?
>>
>> TIA
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nhadie
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>   
>
>
>