[Serusers] [Serdev] loose_route behaviour, detecting single Route with myself

[Martin Hoffmann]

Klaus Darilion wrote:
> 
> 
> Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> 
> > But such a seperation would mean a change in the behavior again, because 
> > currently preloaded requests are also handled by loose_route() (it returns 
> > true for these requests). So it would be only an option to change this in 
> > head.
> 
> I would vote to make totally new functions which also have a better 
> naming. Then people can use the old function with old behavior or the 
> new functions with new behavior.

Me 2. Possibly even put all that into a new rr module (rr2? recroute?).

Regards,
Martin

PS: Why is this thread send to serdev twice? Or is there a difference
    between serdev at iptel.org and serdev at lists.iptel.org?