[Serusers] Strange Via parsing error....

Atle Samuelsen clona at cyberhouse.no
Mon Feb 26 11:29:49 CET 2007


hi

I might be wrong.. but do you have a zyxel router ? I've seen simular on
some zyxel stuff

-Atle

* Greger V. Teigre <greger at teigre.com> [070226 11:25]:
> Bad ALG?
> g-)
> 
> sip wrote:
> >I'm getting an odd Via parsing error from SER 0.9.6: 
> >Feb 23 16:52:49 death ser[17389]: error: parse_via_param Feb 23 16:52:49 death ser[17389]: ERROR: parse_via on: <sip/2.0/udp
> >172.30.237.149:56755;branch=z9hg4bk-d87543-d75bc86d826ac929-1--d87543-> Feb 23 16:52:49 death ser[17389]: ERROR: parse_via 
> >parse error, parsed so
> >far:<sip/2.0/udp
> >172.30.237.149:56755;branch=z9hg4bk-d87543-d75bc86d826ac929-1--d87543-> Feb 23 16:52:49 death ser[17389]: ERROR: 
> >get_hdr_field: bad via Feb 23 16:52:49 death ser[17389]: ERROR: parse_msg: message=<REGISTEl
> >sip:proxy.ideasip.com SIP/2.0> Feb 23 16:52:49 death ser[17389]: ERROR: receive_msg: parse_msg failed 
> >
> >When I look at the packet, it looks like the actual SIP data is somehow
> >getting garbled... with odd characters showing up in the middle of headers, etc. 
> >Any idea what might cause this? 
> >
> >U 148.233.151.30:43764 -> XX.XX.XX.XX:5060
> >REGISTEl sip:proxy.ideasip.com SIP/2.0.
> >Via: sip/2.0/udp
> >172.30.237.149:16240;branch=z9hg4bk-d87543-9332b73b5700e95c-1--d87543-.
> >Max-Forward2a:70.
> >Contactm:<sip:user at 148.233.151.30:32332;rinstance=6c0c8351d99e79db>.
> >To: "mario"<sip:user at proxy.ideasip.com>.
> >From: "mario"<sip:user at proxy.ideasip.com>;tag=fe132761.
> >Call-ID: n2m5owi1odc4mzkznmm5mjflmzvmzmu3zgjmngqym2y..
> >CSe1h:1 register.
> >Expire1k:3600.
> >Allo0b:invite, ack, cancel, options, bye, refer, notify, message, subscribe, info.
> >User-Agen5m:x-lite release 1006e stamp 34025.
> >Content-Lengthl:0.
> >
> >
> >As you can see... things like REGISTEl,  Max Forward2a:   Expire1k: 
> >All these things look garbled.  Would this be a transmission error of some
> >kind (the garbled headers are identical for each submitted packet, though, so
> >it seems unlikely) ? 
> >
> >N. _______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >  
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers



More information about the sr-users mailing list