[Serusers] Ser2.0 wrong behaviour of the sl_reply () function?

[Michal Matyska]

> >> That appear kind of odd to me, I would begin fixing there.
> >> 
> >> But if you think there is possibly some
> >> value in it, there is I believe an option in SER to send back literally
> >> to what is printed in Via (as opposed to reversely sending to previous
> >> hop's transport address). It is normally turned off, becasue Via content
> >> is frequently useless (e.g., due to presence of NATs).
> >> 
> >Would be thanks full if you did:) 
> 
> ... but if you really want to try, set reply_to_via=1.


Not sure if it will work, as you can see from the capture, there are two
received parameters in the reply.... so with the parameter set it will
reply according the via ip:port, but it is also wrong as the first SER
has added received=127.0.0.1.....

Just my $.02
Michal