[Serusers] Re: [Serdev] Re: stateful forking?

[Cesc]

Hi Atle,

Indeed it worked.
When using forward instead of append_branch, the on_reply_route would
only  appear once, either for SER2 or SER3 ... With append_branch, i
get notified of each response received ... nice!

Cesc

On 4/19/07, Atle Samuelsen <clona at cyberhouse.no> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Tell me if it works :) (just fun to know)
>
> _Atle
>
> * Cesc <cesc.santa at gmail.com> [070419 22:00]:
> > Hi Atle!
> >
> > I knew it had to be sth with append_branch, but all (the few) examples
> > I looked at had
> > append_branch with a full sip uri as parameter ... I will try this,
> > but I am sure this will work :)
> >
> > Cesc
> >
> > On 4/19/07, Atle Samuelsen <clona at cyberhouse.no> wrote:
> > >
> > >Hi Cesc :)
> > >
> > >In this case I think I would write something like :
> > >if(!message="REGISTER"){record_route()};
> > >
> > >if(method=="MESSAGE"){
> > >        t_on_reply("5");
> > >        rewritehostport("SER3");
> > >        append_branch();
> > >        rewritehostport("SER2");
> > >        t_relay();
> > >}
> > >
> > >- atle
> > >
> > >* Cesc <cesc.santa at gmail.com> [070419 19:26]:
> > >> With some ser-ish routing code ... what i do now:
> > >>
> > >>       if ( MESSAGE )  {
> > >>                       t_on_reply("5");
> > >>                       rewritehostport( SER3);
> > >>                       forward("IP_MCAST_LOC");
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>               rewritehostport( SER2 );
> > >>               route( ROUTE_RELAY_DO_TRELAY );
> > >>               break;
> > >>       };
> > >>
> > >> On 4/19/07, Cesc <cesc.santa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> >Me = using ser 0.9.6
> > >> >
> > >> >It is not very clear for me what I need to do, so bear with me :)
> > >> >
> > >> >I have a setup such:
> > >> >
> > >> >phone ..... SER1     ........   SER 2
> > >> >                       | .................    SER3
> > >> >So, one ser being frontend of the other 2 ... now, let say that phone
> > >> >sends MESSAGE msgs, which I want both (ser 2 and 3 ) to receive them.
> > >> >So, forking, right?
> > >> >In a previous setup, it sort of work by doing t_newtran() and then
> > >> >sequentially forward(ser2_ip) and t_forward_nonack(ser3_ip_port)  ...
> > >> >not done by me, the setup, i mean. But eventhough I set t_on_reply()
> > >> >routes, I don't see the OK/errors msgs when coming back.
> > >> >Why?
> > >> >Even better, if I could set a different on_reply for ser2 and for ser3 ...
> > >> >
> > >> >Regards,
> > >> >
> > >> >Cesc
> > >> >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Serdev mailing list
> > >> Serdev at lists.iptel.org
> > >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
> > >
>