[Users] Module tm, function t_lookup_request

[Wolfgang Hottgenroth]

Hi,


so

if (method != "ACK" && t_check_trans()) {
  return;
}

should do the job?


Thanks,
Wolfgang



Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> the functionality you describe is preserved and now it is build in
> t_check_trans() - if a retransmission is detected by this function,
> the last reply will be retransmitted and it will break out from script.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> yep, I saw that function. However, I miss the function
>> t_retransmit_reply too. I have the following piece of code in my script:
>>
>>     if (t_lookup_request()) {
>>         t_retransmit_reply();
>>         return;
>>     }
>>
>> This snippet appears very early in the script, before any sophisticated
>> stuff. Using this code I avoided the handling of retransmitted REQUESTs,
>> just to recognize the retransmission in the final t_relay statement,
>> where it would be dropped. Thereby I achieved a remarkable performance
>> increase, since the handling in between is indeed somewhat resource
>> consuming.
>>
>> What can I do now to achieve the retransmission of the reply? Just use
>> t_relay and rely on the recognition therein?
>>
>> Something like this:
>>
>>     if (method != "ACK" && t_check_trans()) {
>>       t_relay();
>>       return;
>>     }
>>
>> In this case, it is crucial, that the retransmission recognition in
>> t_relay works properly and definitely just a retransmission of the reply
>> appears and NO relaying to the destination.
>>
>>
>> Would this work?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Wolfgang
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb:
>>  
>>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>>
>>> the function was replaced by t_check_trans() - a more general
>>> approach. See:
>>>    http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/tm.html#AEN459
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> bogdan
>>>
>>> Wolfgang Hottgenroth wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> what happens to the t_lookup_request function of the tm module in the
>>>> 1.2.0 release? I was using this function in my openser script and
>>>> no it
>>>> disappears. Although the underlying t_check function still exists.
>>>>
>>>> What is the reason?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Wolfgang
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users at openser.org
>>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>         
>>
>>
>>   
>