[Serusers] Implementing call fwd

Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com
Thu Sep 28 07:49:12 CEST 2006


Ser uses '486 busy here' for busy notifications which is correct
according to rfc but sip phones like x-lite, 3CX Phone, SJPhone uses
'480 temp unavailable here' for the same !!!!

 

Regards

Kamal Mann

________________________________

From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger at teigre.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:19 PM
To: Mann, Kamal
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd

 

You do lookup("aliases") and lookup("location") AFTER you have changed
the uri through avp_pushto from usr_preferences.
Is this really what you want?
g-)

Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com wrote: 

 
Hi All
I want to setup Blind call forwarding.  Like if a uri - mann at iptel.org
is not registered with SER but this user had already configured in ser
database table usr_prefrences that his call should be forwarde to
another uri kamal at iptel.org. For that my usr_prefrence table is like
 
 
  

	USR_PREFRENCES table
	 
	
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
	    

+
  

	---------------+
	 
	| uuid | username | domain    | attribute | value
| type
	    

|
  

	modified       |
	 
	
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
	    

+
  

	----------------+
	 
	|      | bhaskar  | debian    | callfwd   | kamal at iptel.org
	|    0 | 20060926165852 |
	 
	|      | mann     | iptel.org | callfwd   | sip:kamal at iptel.org
|    0
	    

|
  

	20060926150443 |
	 
	|      | prateek  | iptel.org | callfwd   | kamal at iptel.org
|    0
	    

|
  

	20060926170701 |
	 
	
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
	    

+
  

	----------------+
	    

 
 
Is this entry is correct?? Is there any flaw in my ser.cfg??
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards
Kamal Mann
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Blair [mailto:blairs at isc.upenn.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:26 PM
To: Mann, Kamal
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
 
 
 
Does your config file relay REFER messages? It needs to in order to 
perform the transfer.
 
Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com wrote:
 
  

	Hi all
	 
	Please help out
	 
	 
	    

------------------------------------------------------------------------
  

	*From:* Mann, Kamal
	*Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:46 PM
	*To:* 'serusers at lists.iptel.org'
	*Subject:* RE: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
	 
	Hi all
	 
	I am implementing Blind call forwarding with 0.9.6 SER version.
But 
	with current configuration it's not working. Please help on
same.
	 
	I am enclosing small part of usr_prefrences table & my ser.cfg.
	 
	
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
	    

-
  

	_______________________________________________
	Serusers mailing list
	Serusers at lists.iptel.org
	http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
	 
	 
	    

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
 
 
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20060928/683aca46/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list