[Serusers] Nathelper Ping OPTIONS

Greger V. Teigre greger at teigre.com
Wed Sep 27 10:18:53 CEST 2006


:-D If she really is beautiful, I would take whatever she could give... 
However, this one doesn't want to talk to you. You need to find some tricks.
g-)

olivier wrote:
> The beautifullest girl of the world can't give you what she doesn't 
> have ;)
>
> Thanks anyway,
>
> Olivier
>
> Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
>> Yes, I saw that. Last time I tried, it worked. I couldn't see what 
>> possibly is wrong from the output and still can't. Sorry.
>> g-)
>>
>> olivier.taylor wrote:
>>> Hi Greger,
>>>
>>> I have tried to apply the patch to 0.9.6, see the result below :(
>>>
>>> I have downloaded the last 0.9.6.
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>> Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
>>>> The patch should work for 0.9.6. AFAIK, 0.10.x already has the 
>>>> OPTIONS support.
>>>> g-)
>>>>
>>>> olivier.taylor wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> just trying to enable the ping functionality in nathelper to send 
>>>>> SIP message (i.e. OPTIONS) instead of 4-byte UDP packets
>>>>> on SER 0.9.6 and 0.10.0
>>>>>
>>>>> as shown below, patch doesn't apply
>>>>> Is there another possibility to have this feature?
>>>>>
>>>>> Olivier
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> patch -p1 < nathelper_ping.patch
>>>>> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
>>>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>> |diff -Naur -x CVS nathelper/nathelper.c nathelper_ping/nathelper.c
>>>>> |--- nathelper/nathelper.c      2006-08-16 08:45:48.000000000 +0200
>>>>> |+++ nathelper_ping/nathelper.c 2006-08-10 14:54:14.000000000 +0200
>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>> Patching file nathelper.c using Plan A...
>>>>> Hunk #1 failed at 118.
>>>>> Hunk #2 failed at 172.
>>>>> Hunk #3 failed at 193.
>>>>> Hunk #4 failed at 212.
>>>>> Hunk #5 failed at 239.
>>>>> Hunk #6 failed at 257.
>>>>> Hunk #7 failed at 267.
>>>>> Hunk #8 failed at 276.
>>>>> Hunk #9 failed at 320.
>>>>> Hunk #10 failed at 367.
>>>>> Hunk #11 failed at 1543.
>>>>> 11 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to nathelper.c.rej
>>>>> Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
>>>>> T
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>



More information about the sr-users mailing list