[Serusers] Nathelper Ping OPTIONS

[Greger V. Teigre]

Yes, I saw that. Last time I tried, it worked. I couldn't see what 
possibly is wrong from the output and still can't. Sorry.
g-)

olivier.taylor wrote:
> Hi Greger,
>
> I have tried to apply the patch to 0.9.6, see the result below :(
>
> I have downloaded the last 0.9.6.
>
> Olivier
>
> Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
>> The patch should work for 0.9.6. AFAIK, 0.10.x already has the 
>> OPTIONS support.
>> g-)
>>
>> olivier.taylor wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> just trying to enable the ping functionality in nathelper to send 
>>> SIP message (i.e. OPTIONS) instead of 4-byte UDP packets
>>> on SER 0.9.6 and 0.10.0
>>>
>>> as shown below, patch doesn't apply
>>> Is there another possibility to have this feature?
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>>
>>> patch -p1 < nathelper_ping.patch
>>> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
>>> The text leading up to this was:
>>> --------------------------
>>> |diff -Naur -x CVS nathelper/nathelper.c nathelper_ping/nathelper.c
>>> |--- nathelper/nathelper.c      2006-08-16 08:45:48.000000000 +0200
>>> |+++ nathelper_ping/nathelper.c 2006-08-10 14:54:14.000000000 +0200
>>> --------------------------
>>> Patching file nathelper.c using Plan A...
>>> Hunk #1 failed at 118.
>>> Hunk #2 failed at 172.
>>> Hunk #3 failed at 193.
>>> Hunk #4 failed at 212.
>>> Hunk #5 failed at 239.
>>> Hunk #6 failed at 257.
>>> Hunk #7 failed at 267.
>>> Hunk #8 failed at 276.
>>> Hunk #9 failed at 320.
>>> Hunk #10 failed at 367.
>>> Hunk #11 failed at 1543.
>>> 11 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to nathelper.c.rej
>>> Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
>>> T
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>