[Serusers] Performance
Jiri Kuthan
jiri at iptel.org
Tue Sep 26 00:51:26 CEST 2006
At 23:59 25/09/2006, Weiter Leiter wrote:
>SER goes past a couple of thousands CPS into simple proxying setups.
>However, in most common setups, the storage backends prove to add quite a drag.
Glad to second that opinion. Well -- it is easy to explain, for one SIP transaction
one has modulo six database transactions. SIP is about text processing. Database
is about I/O. So what are you going to optimize first? :-)
-jiri
>There isn't (yet?) a benchmarking SER config.
>Hence the question: how did you test?
>
>On 9/25/06, Victoria Cortez <<mailto:ser_list at conexiongroup.com>ser_list at conexiongroup.com> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
> I've been making some performance tests with Ser on a huge and powerfull hardware. I couldn't reach 1000 CPS. Did anybody reached or past this amount of traffic with Ser?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
>Víctor
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
><mailto:Serusers at lists.iptel.org>Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
More information about the sr-users
mailing list