[Serusers] deference between rtpproxy and mediaproxy
Greger V. Teigre
greger at teigre.com
Mon Sep 11 12:00:01 CEST 2006
FYI: The newest version of rtpproxy can do load balancing...
g-)
sip wrote:
> I don't think that's entirely fair. We've seen deployments of rtpproxy
> with several thousand streams (compared to a few dozen on mediaproxy).
> The biggest problem, of course, becomes that then you're into the
> gigabits of bandwidth realm.... which gets pricey.
>
> The biggest differences between mediaproxy and rtpproxy:
>
> mediaproxy:
> -written in python
> -uses DNS srv records to allow you to distribute the load onto
> multuple servers regionally, geographically, etc.
> -has a nifty web interface to let you look at statistics of the server
> (ongoing streams, etc).
> -can't handle a WHOLE lot of streams per box
>
> rtpproxy:
> -written in C
> -doesn't handle distribution of load (for this, you'd need to do some
> tricks with load balancing on your own -- local, or geographical load
> balancing. Not easy, but possible).
> -doesn't have any sort of useful interface to gather information about
> the server and what it's doing
> -handles a LOT of streams on a decently-powered box
>
>
> There are limits to both, of course. You're best off limiting the
> number of users who require the use of mediaproxy or rtpproxy with
> some effective coding and standards (in reality, the ONLY people who
> should be using it are people who are connecting via a symmetric NAT)
> to avoid bottlenecks.
>
> Like ANY thing else in the massive deployment world, there is always a
> bottleneck in any SIP scenario, but also like any other massive
> deployment, you need to analyse your particular environment and decide
> what works best for you to minimise the bottlenecks using good network
> design, not just good software.
>
>
> N.
> *
>
> On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:26:57 -0400, Script Head wrote*
> > Mediaproxy is more mature but rtpproxy can handle greater load. IMHO
> both aren't truly fit for the job and consume too much CPU to be
> useful on large scale.
> >
> > On 9/10/06, * vijay tiwari* <vijay11tiwari at yahoo.com
> <mailto:vijay11tiwari at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > hi
> >
> >
> > what is the deference between rtpporxy and mediaproxy
> >
> >
> > with regards
> >
> >
> >
> > /Vijay Tiwari/
> > /Network Admin/
> > /Sachitel Communications/
> > /Noida(U.P.)/
> > /M- 09871633711/
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> > Get on board. You're invited
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=40791/*http:/advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta>
> to try the new Yahoo! Mail.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers at lists.iptel.org>
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20060911/5688a19b/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list