[SPAM header] - Re: [Serusers] CPU % - Email found in subject

Greger V. Teigre greger at teigre.com
Thu Sep 7 20:56:32 CEST 2006


Do you use exec?  Anyway, you won't get a lot of attention on this list 
until you upgrade I'm afraid... Also, check http://bugs.sip-router.org/ 
for any closed, relevant bugs.
g-)

Teran Jesus wrote:
> I think 4 proces are block, and take a lot of % of CPU, yesterday I restart
> the SER and now loo like this:
>
> root     29921  0.0  0.3 37548 3712 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29923  0.0  0.3 37548 3708 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29925  0.0  0.3 37548 3708 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29928  0.0  0.3 37548 3708 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29934  0.0  0.3 37548 3708 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29945  0.0  0.3 37548 3708 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29946  0.0  0.3 37548 3708 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29949  0.0  0.3 37548 3708 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29953  0.0  0.3 37548 3708 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29958  0.0  0.4 37548 4396 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29959  0.0  0.4 37548 4376 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29960  0.0  0.4 37548 4388 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29961  0.0  0.4 37548 4400 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29962  0.0  0.4 37548 4368 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29963  0.0  0.4 37548 4404 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29964  0.0  0.4 37548 4412 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29965  0.0  0.4 37548 4376 ?        S    Sep06   0:00 /usr/sbin/ser
> root     29966  0.0  0.5 38560 5712 ?        S    Sep06   0:06 /usr/sbin/ser
>
> and the  vmstat like this:
>
> procs                      memory      swap          io     system
> cpu
>  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs us sy id
> wa
>  0  0  17188  20012 169196 623072    0    0     1     2    1     1  0  0  0
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20012 169196 623072    0    0     0    36  124    76  0  0 100
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20008 169196 623072    0    0     0    20  121    68  0  0 100
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20004 169196 623072    0    0     0     0  108    34  0  0 100
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20004 169196 623072    0    0     0     0  114    56  0  0 100
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20004 169196 623072    0    0     0    24  128   137  0  0 100
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20004 169196 623072    0    0     0    20  133   110  0  0 100
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20004 169196 623072    0    0     0     0  116    93  0  0 100
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20004 169196 623072    0    0     0     0  136   178  0  0 100
> 0
>  0  0  17188  20004 169196 623072    0    0     0     0  134   192  0  0 99
> 0
>
> We can see all is normal only one percent of the Server is used.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger at teigre.com]
> Sent: Jueves, 07 de Septiembre de 2006 02:17 a.m.
> To: Teran Jesus
> Cc: Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [SPAM header] - Re: [Serusers] CPU % - Email found in subject
>
>
> Well, 0.8.14 is the latest in the 0.8 series, while the latest stable 
> release is the 0.9.x series. Maybe you want to consider upgrading?
> Apart from that, I see a lot of numbers, but you don't say what you 
> think is wrong?!
> g-)
>
> Teran Jesus wrote:
>   
>> Hello i am using the ser 0.8.12, it works fine, right now i run the linux
>> comand ps -aux , to see the list of proces that are runing and i see that
>>     
> i
>   
>> have SER proces like the next, can you said me if it is correct or i have
>>     
> a
>   
>> problem with my ser or is a problem with the version of the SER, because
>> sometimes the SER needs to reset because don't respond, if you see the
>>     
> last
>   
>> SER reset tht i need to made was August 25.
>>  
>>
>> USER         PID      %CPU   %MEM VSZ  RSS TTY      STAT           START
>> TIME          COMMAND
>> root     24416 32.4  0.7 38668 7456 ?        R    Aug25 5547:04
>> /usr/sbin/ser
>> root     24421 32.4  0.7 38684 7468 ?        R    Aug25 5537:54
>> /usr/sbin/ser
>> root     24426 32.4  0.7 38664 7484 ?        R    Aug25 5541:14
>> /usr/sbin/ser
>> root     24431 32.4  0.7 38652 7468 ?        R    Aug25 5543:54
>> /usr/sbin/ser
>> root     24437  0.0  0.8 38676 9056 ?        S    Aug25   5:56
>>     
> /usr/sbin/ser
>   
>> root     24439  0.0  0.8 38756 9064 ?        S    Aug25   6:10
>>     
> /usr/sbin/ser
>   
>> root     24444 32.4  0.7 38684 7456 ?        R    Aug25 5551:00
>> /usr/sbin/ser
>> root     24450 32.4  0.7 38664 7472 ?        R    Aug25 5539:39
>> /usr/sbin/ser
>>
>> I ran the vmstat 1 10   too and i believe is not normall the processing,
>>     
> can
>   
>> you help me?.
>>
>>  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs us sy
>>     
> id
>   
>> wa
>>  6  0  27440  17824 168972 649488    0    0     1     2    0     2  0  0
>>     
> 1
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17844 168972 649488    0    0     0    40  130 480364 12 87
>>     
> 1
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17844 168972 649488    0    0     0     0  118 475900 11 89
>>     
> 0
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17840 168972 649488    0    0     0     0  120 481403 11 87
>>     
> 2
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17840 168972 649488    0    0     0     0  114 483715 12 86
>>     
> 2
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17836 168972 649488    0    0     0    36  134 476488 12 87
>>     
> 1
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17840 168972 649488    0    0     0    64  137 482903 14 84
>>     
> 1
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17840 168972 649488    0    0     0    68  148 473984 14 86
>>     
> 0
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17840 168972 649488    0    0     0    64  143 476887 12 88
>>     
> 0
>   
>> 0
>>  6  0  27440  17840 168972 649488    0    0     0    52  147 476060 12 88
>>     
> 0
>   
>> 0
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20060907/bf07f00a/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list