[Serusers] About the failure route problem

[Andrey Kouprianov]

Thanx Greger! That's a good info update for me

On 9/7/06, Greger V. Teigre <greger at teigre.com> wrote:
> Andrey,
> calling a route from failure route is quite allright, sometimes even
> needed as some commands are not allowed in failure route...
> g-)
>
> Andrey Kouprianov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've never seen this kind of config before. Meaning I never see anyone
> > call a route block from failure_route. Try put route block's contents
> > into failure_route. Plus, you forward before you even set the failure
> > route.. Im not sure if that's a good idea too.
> >
> >   Andrey.
> >
> > P.S - Maybe someone can suggest more on this issue??
> >
> > On 9/7/06, AR. <arr at alumni.csie.ncu.edu.tw> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all
> >>     I have a problme about the failure route
> >>
> >>     My scenario is that:
> >>     If voice gateway 1 is busy then forward the call to the voice
> >> gateway 2
> >>
> >>    My config is :
> >>    route[5] {
> >>       rewritehostport("voice_gateway_1:5060");
> >>       forward(uri:host, uri:port);
> >>       t_on_failure("2");
> >>       if(isflagset(1))
> >>          append_branch();
> >>       setflag(1);
> >>       t_relay();
> >>       break;
> >> }
> >>  failure_route[2] {
> >>         route(6);
> >> }
> >> route[6] {
> >>       rewritehostport("voice_gateway_2:5060");
> >>       forward(uri:host, uri:port);
> >>       break;
> >> }
> >>  But it still doesn't work
> >>  anyone help?
> >>
> >> Best Regards
> >> AR.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Serusers mailing list
> >> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
>