[Serusers] About the failure route problem

[Andrey Kouprianov]

Hi,

I've never seen this kind of config before. Meaning I never see anyone
call a route block from failure_route. Try put route block's contents
into failure_route. Plus, you forward before you even set the failure
route.. Im not sure if that's a good idea too.

   Andrey.

P.S - Maybe someone can suggest more on this issue??

On 9/7/06, AR. <arr at alumni.csie.ncu.edu.tw> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>     I have a problme about the failure route
>
>     My scenario is that:
>     If voice gateway 1 is busy then forward the call to the voice gateway 2
>
>    My config is :
>    route[5] {
>       rewritehostport("voice_gateway_1:5060");
>       forward(uri:host, uri:port);
>       t_on_failure("2");
>       if(isflagset(1))
>          append_branch();
>       setflag(1);
>       t_relay();
>       break;
> }
>  failure_route[2] {
>         route(6);
> }
> route[6] {
>       rewritehostport("voice_gateway_2:5060");
>       forward(uri:host, uri:port);
>       break;
> }
>  But it still doesn't work
>  anyone help?
>
> Best Regards
> AR.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>