[Serusers] Need help finding workaround for PRACK method

[Greger V. Teigre]

I would recommend you look at http://iptel.org/sems
Latest version of SEMS is capable of a whole of things and you could 
maybe do something there.
g-)

Tomas Grinevičius wrote:
> Hello Greger,
>
>  
>
> Thank you for your fast response. I would like to ask you one question 
> personally. Do you think is there any Opensource proxy could do 
> simulation of PRACK message instead of transporting it transparently?
>
>  
> /Tomas
>
>  
> On 10/10/06, *Greger V. Teigre* <greger at teigre.com 
> <mailto:greger at teigre.com>> wrote:
>
>     Not without developing a new module.
>     g-)
>
>     Tomas Grinevičius wrote:
>>
>>          Hi,
>>
>>      
>>
>>     I have problem with PRACK support on my equipment. Central Switch
>>     requires support of PRACK method and some CPE does not support it
>>     properly…
>>
>>      
>>
>>     Could someone advice me if SER would be capable of "terminating"
>>     PRACK requests between softswich?
>>
>>     SER should only transparently process all request, send PRACK
>>     request for soft-switch and modify fields that PRACK should not
>>     be triggered in CPE devices.
>>
>>      
>>     Please help!!!
>>
>>     Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>>      
>>     /Tomas
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Serusers mailing list
>>     Serusers at lists.iptel.org <mailto:Serusers at lists.iptel.org>
>>     http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>       
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20061012/eb0ea272/attachment.htm>