[Serusers] cancel message and to tag
Pat Wang
wangyu39 at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 10 23:13:25 CEST 2006
How come SER sends an 183? that's early media response and SER has nothing
to do with it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hye-Jeong Mok" <hyejeongmok at hotmail.com>
To: <serusers at lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 12:35 AM
Subject: [Serusers] cancel message and to tag
> Hi,
>
> Have a question about the CANCEL message and the to tag. Let say I have a
> UAC sending INVITE to SER. SER responds with 183 message with a to tag =
> 111. Then the UAC sends CANCEL with no tag, and SER responds with 200
> message with the new to tag = 222, followed by 487 message with to tag
> 222. SER 0.9.0 that I'm using behaves this way.
>
> I believe in 3261, the to tag of the 200 message in response to the CANCEL
> that has no tag, it has to be the same as the to tag that is in the
> previous 1xx message. So in this case, SER that I'm using is doing
> something wrong? Any idea how to fix this?
>
> Thanks,
> HJ
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
> http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list