[Users] Problem with module dispatcher

[Bogdan-Andrei Iancu]

Hi Jose,

I guess the address of the lb is 192.168.1.23, right? I see in receive 
ACK no Route hdr or RURI containing this address....

also, are you sure you ACK hits loose_route() ? how the RURI is changed 
doesn't reflects a loose_route() but more a static routing into the 
script...

regards,
bogdan

Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:

> ACK sip:gil at 192.168.1.28 SIP/2.0..
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
> 192.168.1.28:3806;branch=z9hG4bK8010c001d753db11bc2c000f1f72ea95..
> Route: <sip:192.168.1.20;lr=on;ftag=20935>..
> From: alex <sip:alex at 192.168.1.28:3806>;tag=20935..
> To: <sip:gil at 192.168.1.23>;tag=80892cfed653db1187ca000f1f72ea95..
> Call-ID: 80892CFE-D653-DB11-BC2B- 000F1F72EA95 at 192.168.1.28..
> CSeq: 2 ACK..Contact: <sip:alex at 192.168.1.28:3806>..
> Max-Forwards: 70..
> Content-Length: 0....
>
> And, this is the message that the balancer openser server send:
>
> ACK sip:gil at 192.168.1.20:5060 SIP/2.0..
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.23;branch=z9hG4bK9411.466dcab6.2..
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
> 192.168.1.28:3806;branch=z9hG4bK8010c001d753db11bc2c000f1f72ea95..
> Route: <sip:192.168.1.20;lr=on;ftag=20935>..
> From: alex <sip:alex at 192.168.1.28:3806>;tag=20935..
> To: <sip:gil at 192.168.1.23>;tag=80892cfed653db1187ca000f1f72ea95..
> Call-ID: 80892CFE-D653-DB11-BC2B-000F1F72EA95 at 192.168.1.28..
> CSeq: 2 ACK..Contact: <sip:alex at 192.168.1.28:3806>..
> Max-Forwards: 69..
> Content-Length: 0.... 
>
>
> Regards!
>
>
>
> */Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro>/* escribió:
>
>     Hi Jose,
>
>     you need both record_route() and loose_route().
>
>     regards,
>     bogdan
>
>     Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
>
>     > Hi
>     > In my server I have:
>     >
>     > if (!method=="REGISTER"){
>     > setflag(1);
>     > setflag(2);
>     > record_route();
>     > }
>     >
>     >
>     > Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:36:49 +0300
>     > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>     > >
>     > Subject: Re: [Users] Problem with module dispatcher
>     > To: Jose Gil Navarrete
>     > >
>     > Cc: users at openser.org
>     >
>     > Message-ID: <451CBF01.9030508 at voice-system.ro
>     > >
>     > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>     >
>     > Hello,
>     >
>     > do you do record routing on server? The ACK should follow Route
>     > headers.
>     >
>     > A network trace (ngrep, ethereal) will help to identify the
>     cause for
>     > the problem.
>     >
>     > Cheers,
>     > Daniel
>     >
>     >
>     > On 09/29/06 00:29, Jose Gil Navarrete wrote:
>     > > Hi all
>     > >
>     > > I have implemented the load balance in mode statefull, I
>     obtained the
>     > > next messages:
>     > >
>     > > phone1 dispatcher
>     > > sipserver phone2
>     > > --------INVITE--------> ----INVITE----------->
>     > > ----INVITE-------->
>     > > <----100 TRYING---- <---100 TRYING---- <---100 TRYING----
>     > > <----180 RINGING-- <---180 RINGING--- <---180 RINGING---
>     > > <----200 OK---------- <----- 200 OK-------- <---200
>     > > OK--------
>     > > -------- ACK --------> --------- ACK -------->
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > You can see that the sipserver never sends ACK message to
>     > video_phone2.
>     > > Is this correct?
>     > >
>     > > Then I try the next, in the sipserver:
>     > > if (method =="ACK"){
>     > > if (!t_relay()) {
>     > > sl_reply_error();
>     > > };
>     > > return;
>     > > }
>     > >
>     > > But the sipserver doesn't send the message ACK at the phone2?
>     > > Does some body know what it's wrong?
>     > >
>     > >
>     >
>     >
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y *2GB* extra a tu
>     correo
>     > por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx
>     >
>     >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >
>     >_______________________________________________
>     >Users mailing list
>     >Users at openser.org
>     >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>     >
>     >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y *2GB* extra a tu correo 
> por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx