[serusers]: trusted table(permissions module)

Andrey Kuprianov andrey.kouprianov at gmail.com
Thu Nov 2 06:03:42 CET 2006


Hi Kamal,

Whenever you modified your ser.cfg did you restart SER after? Did you
check your ser.cfg for errors using "ser -c" command? I found some
errors in your ser.cfg code. For instance, inside the main route
block, your "if", which processes INVITEs, is missing a semicolon at
the end of the block.

if (method=="INVITE")
{
#	sl_send_reply("404", "INVITE  ");
	route(3);
                break;
}   <----- missing semicolon here


If you are comfortable with your current ser.cfg, that's ok, but I'd
suggest you start with a fresh one, make your trusted table work, and
then add a "REFER" processing, like in your currect ser.cfg. Just
download one fresh ser.cfg from iptel.org site and add your
allow_trusted() "if" clause there.

  Regards,

    Andrey.


On 11/2/06, Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com <Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com> wrote:
> Hi
> Please find ser.cfg enclosed.
>
> Trusted table entry:
> +---------------+-------+--------------+
> | src_ip        | proto | from_pattern |
> +---------------+-------+--------------+
> | 10.25.119.156 | any   | ^sip:.*$     |
> +---------------+-------+--------------+
> 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
>
> Thanks in anticipation
> Kamal Mann
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Andrey Kuprianov
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 7:03 PM
> To: serusers at iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [serusers]: trusted table(permissions module)
>
>  Hi Kamal,
>
> I understand your setup. Nevertheless, it will be difficult to figure
> out your problem, w/o your ser.cfg file at hand. Also, send a trusted
> table query result (i.e. that row which contains entry for your
> SIP-AS).
>
>   Regards,
>
>     Andrey.
>
> On 11/1/06, Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com <Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com> wrote:
> > Hi All
> > In my scenario I need ser to communicate with my SIP-AS. This SIP-AS is having an application xyz running on it. This XYZ sends an invite to URI "A at xcv.de" which is a subscriber in SER and this is in TO header of Invite msg & FROM header contains another URI test at xcv.de but this URI (test at xcv.de) isn't registered / subscribed to SER. I need SER trust all packets from SIP-AS ip. BUT SER is sending 407 reply of INVITE to XYZ application! IP in trusted table is of SIP-AS on top of which XYZ application is running.
> >
> > Thanks in anticipation
> > Kamal Mann
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Maciej Żwirski [mailto:mzwirek at poczta.fm]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 3:20 PM
> > To: serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > Subject: Re: [serusers]: trusted table(permissions module)
> >
> > Kamal.Mann at t-systems.com wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > I made an entry /"10.25.119.156, any, ^sip:.*$"/ into trusted table so
> > > that any packet sent from 10.25.119.156 would be trusted by SER and
> > > don't ask for its credentials. But SER is replying *407- proxy* auth
> > > needed!!  After this I tried with permissions.allow file:
> > >
> > Hi,
> > I had the same issue while interconnecting SER and Asterisk. It turned
> > out to be an issue on Asterisk side (I had the same user added for SER
> > and Asterisk, so the poor thing couldn't authorize either :)) So you
> > could check if the 407 you're getting is from SER or from the remote host.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Maciej Zwirski
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Jestes kierowca? To poczytaj! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f199e
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
>
>


More information about the sr-users mailing list