[Fwd: Re: [Users] Why is fix_nated_sdp appending 127.0.0.1 at the end of my c= lines?]
nick
nick at mobilia.it
Wed Nov 22 09:51:29 CET 2006
nick wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Users] Why is fix_nated_sdp appending 127.0.0.1 at the end
> of my c= lines?
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:46:42 +0100
> From: nick <nick at mobilia.it>
> To: Ovidiu Sas <sip.nslu at gmail.com>
> References: <4562E2D7.7010403 at mobilia.it>
> <4562E82E.4070503 at pernau.at> <45631216.3000800 at mobilia.it>
> <6f497e130611210650i409e6cfblfb39b0d8a0b9f2e2 at mail.gmail.com>
> <45631873.8010400 at mobilia.it>
> <6f497e130611210724p4b3ead9bha95cb848c29d276c at mail.gmail.com>
>
> Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> It seems that you are trying to do a double processing of the SDP
>> (that's why you have 2 IPs inside SDP). Check you script if you use
>> force_rtp_proxy and fix_nated_sdp at the same time.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ovidiu Sas
>>
>> On 11/21/06, nick <nick at mobilia.it> wrote:
>>> Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>>> > check the '-d' argument. If you don't specify '-d', ngrep will only
>>> > listen to one interface. '-d any' will force ngrep to listen to all
>>> > interfaces, including the loopback.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Hope this helps,
>>> > Ovidiu Sas
>>>
>>> BTW, I changed my fix_nated_sdp() command to fix_nated_sdp("10") only,
>>> which is adding the origin IP instead of the mediaproxy one.. I don't
>>> mind this, but it still seems to be adding the 127.0.0.1
>>>
>>>
>>
> Actually, I'm using mediaproxy and fix_nated_sdp at the same time, I am
> using fix_nated_sdp because for some reason, mediaproxy isn't changing
> the SDP information in the SIP requests (or at least, it wasn't
> beforehand).
>
> I'll have a look at where it might be overlapping.
>
>
> whoops forgot to cc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
I'm not sure where it's overlapping, the only place I call both
fix_nated_sdp() and use_media_proxy() together are in the reply route
section..
The strange thing is, before I added in fix_nated_sdp(), there were no
changes at all to the sdp string (they remained private IP addresses).
My .cfg is attached, can anyone point out where I might be forcing a loop?
Nick
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: openser.txt
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20061122/34267798/attachment.txt>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list