[Users] Re: State of T.38 and MediaProxy/RTPProxy

[Ovidiu Sas]

It should.  There's nothing special about nathelper/rtpproxy.


Regards,
Ovidiu

On 11/3/06, Bastian Schern <ml02 at in-bln.de> wrote:
> Ovidiu Sas schrieb:
> > T.38 over udptl is well supported by nathelper/rtpproxy.
> > RFC 4612 is pretty fresh (August 2006) ... so I wouldn't expect to see
> > many implementations at this point in time.  But I might be wrong :)
>
> This sounds good. Do you know if the SIPURA/Linksys ATAs are working
> fine with nathelper/rtpproxy and UDPTL?
>
> Regards
>         Bastian
> [...]
>
> >
> > On 11/3/06, Bastian Schern <ml02 at in-bln.de> wrote:
> >> Doug Meredith schrieb:
> >> > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> should be no issue with T38 as it is encapsulated in RTP and both
> >> media
> >> >> relays operates at RTP level.
> >> >
> >> > My knowledge of T38 is pretty limited, but my understanding is that
> >> > T38 allows for RTP media as well as another method of transporting
> >> > media.  If your devices are not using RTP then MediaProxy probably
> >> > won't work.
> >> >
> >> > Feel free to beat on me if I have this all wrong.
> >> >
> >> > Doug
> >>
> >> I don't beat you, you're right in this point. ;-)
> >>
> >> But the Problem is that the most T.38 Devices are using UDPTL for media.
> >>
> >> Do you know some devices which are using RTP for T.38?
> >>
> >> Is the rtpproxy/nathelper able to handle UDPTL?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>         Bastian
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Users mailing list
> >> Users at openser.org
> >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
>
>