[Serusers] PA error sending notifies

İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) ilkera at koc.net
Tue May 16 16:52:43 CEST 2006


Excuse me ; what works ?
Presence ? Watcherinfo ? Everything ?

What do I need to make Presence work ?

Thanks...

-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces at iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of samuel
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 5:31 PM
To: Vaclav Kubart
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] PA error sending notifies

Blame on me!!!!! It does work!!!!

I was trying several things and once I saw something like lookup_domain only works on cache mode and the list was not found but I have just tried and it works.....

Apologies!!!
Samuel.

2006/5/16, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart at iptel.org>:
> This is strange, I try to look on it.
> I thought, that lookup_user and lookup_domain work with database
> independently on usrloc.
>
>         Vaclav
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:59:10AM +0200, samuel wrote:
> > There's anothing issue that can be mentioned in the handbook:
> >
> > using usrloc module with db backend (db_mode!=0) entails that all
> > lookup_user||lookup_domain calls will fail and the example configs
> > that appear on the presence documentation will not offer the
> > expected behaviour...
> > Another option is to wait until lookup_* functions work with DB backend...
> >
> > Samuel.
> >
> > 2006/5/15, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart at iptel.org>:
> > >Hi,
> > >this problem I'm trying to solve with Ilker Aktuna. I try to
> > >simulate it on my machine and let you know. Or if you solve it, please let me know.
> > >:-)
> > >
> > >Please, could you tell me, what things you were missing in presence
> > >handbook? I'm trying to do it as useful as possible and whatever
> > >ideas are welcome...
> > >
> > >        Vaclav
> > >
> > >On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:38:02PM +0200, samuel wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I recently had a few hours and start installing the presence
> > >> staff and I have to say that I have it amost workign thanks to
> > >> the presence handbook, the mailing list and, obviously, a little
> > >> bit of code review..:P
> > >>
> > >> I have two SER instances, the "proxy" and the "presence server"
> > >> (both with last CVS code) co-located in the same host and I have
> > >> an issue when the "presence server" tries to send the NOTIFY
> > >> requests. Below there's an attched log showing the problem (on IP
> > >> a.b.c.d I've got the two instances):
> > >>
> > >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:378: sending winfo notify
> > >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:383: winfo document created
> > >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:391: creating headers
> > >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:398: headers created
> > >> 3(30682) DEBUG:tm:t_uac:
> > >> next_hop=<sip:a.b.c.d;transport=tcp;ftag=c77b3f33;lr=on>
> > >> 3(30682) t_uac: no socket found
> > >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:402: request sent with result -7
> > >> 3(30682) ERROR: notify.c:404: Can't send watcherinfo notification
> > >> (-7)
> > >>
> > >> This problem appears in other places, not only in the
> > >> notifications for winfo so probably there's somthing in the
> > >> selection of the outgoing socket directing to the local IP.
> > >>
> > >> >From the proxy part I just ust t_forward_nonack for the "SIMPLE"
> > >> messages with record route....maybe adding the port in the record
> > >> route should help?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Samuel.
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Serusers mailing list
> > >> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
>

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers




 <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/010D0604/0407490F/07044D03/92511125.jpg>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa,  icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz  ve  tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz.  Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. 
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential  information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however,  sender  cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20060516/866a240d/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list