[Serusers] PA error sending notifies

[Vaclav Kubart]

:-) Fine. But it could be still the case, that it works only
sometimes... I hope not... If it will return, please let me know.

	Vaclav

On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 04:30:56PM +0200, samuel wrote:
> Blame on me!!!!! It does work!!!!
> 
> I was trying several things and once I saw something like
> lookup_domain only works on cache mode and the list was not found but
> I have just tried and it works.....
> 
> Apologies!!!
> Samuel.
> 
> 2006/5/16, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart at iptel.org>:
> >This is strange, I try to look on it.
> >I thought, that lookup_user and lookup_domain work with database
> >independently on usrloc.
> >
> >        Vaclav
> >
> >On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:59:10AM +0200, samuel wrote:
> >> There's anothing issue that can be mentioned in the handbook:
> >>
> >> using usrloc module with db backend (db_mode!=0) entails that all
> >> lookup_user||lookup_domain calls will fail and the example configs
> >> that appear on the presence documentation will not offer the expected
> >> behaviour...
> >> Another option is to wait until lookup_* functions work with DB 
> >backend...
> >>
> >> Samuel.
> >>
> >> 2006/5/15, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart at iptel.org>:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >this problem I'm trying to solve with Ilker Aktuna. I try to simulate it
> >> >on my machine and let you know. Or if you solve it, please let me know.
> >> >:-)
> >> >
> >> >Please, could you tell me, what things you were missing in presence
> >> >handbook? I'm trying to do it as useful as possible and whatever ideas
> >> >are welcome...
> >> >
> >> >        Vaclav
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:38:02PM +0200, samuel wrote:
> >> >> Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >> I recently had a few hours and start installing the presence staff and
> >> >> I have to say that I have it amost workign thanks to the presence
> >> >> handbook, the mailing list and, obviously, a little bit of code
> >> >> review..:P
> >> >>
> >> >> I have two SER instances, the "proxy" and the "presence server" (both
> >> >> with last CVS code) co-located in the same host and I have an issue
> >> >> when the "presence server" tries to send the NOTIFY requests. Below
> >> >> there's an attched log showing the problem (on IP a.b.c.d I've got the
> >> >> two instances):
> >> >>
> >> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:378: sending winfo notify
> >> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:383: winfo document created
> >> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:391: creating headers
> >> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:398: headers created
> >> >> 3(30682) DEBUG:tm:t_uac:
> >> >> next_hop=<sip:a.b.c.d;transport=tcp;ftag=c77b3f33;lr=on>
> >> >> 3(30682) t_uac: no socket found
> >> >> 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:402: request sent with result -7
> >> >> 3(30682) ERROR: notify.c:404: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7)
> >> >>
> >> >> This problem appears in other places, not only in the notifications
> >> >> for winfo so probably there's somthing in the selection of the
> >> >> outgoing socket directing to the local IP.
> >> >>
> >> >> >From the proxy part I just ust t_forward_nonack for the "SIMPLE"
> >> >> messages with record route....maybe adding the port in the record
> >> >> route should help?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Samuel.
> >> >>
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Serusers mailing list
> >> >> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> >> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >> >
> >