[Serusers] PA error sending notifies

[samuel]

Let's see if I can finish the e-mail before gmail decides it's enough...:P

006/5/15, samuel <samu60 at gmail.com>:
> Following with the handbook...

>
> the authorize message in the sample confgi files has as parameter the
> xcap root while it should have the xml file containing the auth.rules.


Instead of

>
> if (authorize_message("http://localhost/xcap")) {

there should be

if (authorize_message("im-rules.xml")){

>
>
>
> 2006/5/15, samuel <samu60 at gmail.com>:
> > First of all, I have to thank you for the time you spent writing the
> > handbook, it's really really helpfull....I wish all SER related parts
> > had this docs..
> >
> > I'll try to get familiar with the code of the notifications and I'll
> > try to find something....which I don't thing so :P. I'll also merge
> > the two functionalities (proxy + presence) in a unique config file to
> > see if it works.
> > I hope I can provide more info these following days.
> >
> > About the missing things in the presence handbook, probably the most
> > important is the new xcap module because in the sample config files
> > it's missing.
> > Another thing is that in the XCAP structure description, the im-rules
> > directory is missing, which might lead to misunderstandings. I
> > downloaded the structure from the iptel's ftp and inside the im-rules
> > there were several files corresponding to presence-rules which should
> > be either removed or updated with the im-rules namespaces and removing
> > the whitelist.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Samuel.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2006/5/15, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart at iptel.org>:
> > > Hi,
> > > this problem I'm trying to solve with Ilker Aktuna. I try to simulate it
> > > on my machine and let you know. Or if you solve it, please let me know.
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > Please, could you tell me, what things you were missing in presence
> > > handbook? I'm trying to do it as useful as possible and whatever ideas
> > > are welcome...
> > >
> > >         Vaclav
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 01:38:02PM +0200, samuel wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I recently had a few hours and start installing the presence staff and
> > > > I have to say that I have it amost workign thanks to the presence
> > > > handbook, the mailing list and, obviously, a little bit of code
> > > > review..:P
> > > >
> > > > I have two SER instances, the "proxy" and the "presence server" (both
> > > > with last CVS code) co-located in the same host and I have an issue
> > > > when the "presence server" tries to send the NOTIFY requests. Below
> > > > there's an attched log showing the problem (on IP a.b.c.d I've got the
> > > > two instances):
> > > >
> > > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:378: sending winfo notify
> > > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:383: winfo document created
> > > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:391: creating headers
> > > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:398: headers created
> > > > 3(30682) DEBUG:tm:t_uac:
> > > > next_hop=<sip:a.b.c.d;transport=tcp;ftag=c77b3f33;lr=on>
> > > > 3(30682) t_uac: no socket found
> > > > 3(30682) DEBUG notify.c:402: request sent with result -7
> > > > 3(30682) ERROR: notify.c:404: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7)
> > > >
> > > > This problem appears in other places, not only in the notifications
> > > > for winfo so probably there's somthing in the selection of the
> > > > outgoing socket directing to the local IP.
> > > >
> > > > >From the proxy part I just ust t_forward_nonack for the "SIMPLE"
> > > > messages with record route....maybe adding the port in the record
> > > > route should help?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Samuel.
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Serusers mailing list
> > > > serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> >
>