[Serusers] NAT Traversal using nathelper module

[O.]

thanks, so we have to keep the proxy.
In this case when one of the client will be behind nat does the proxy
will transfer the RTP? or still the the RTP will be route without proxy
involved?

Thanks,
O. 

On Sat, 2006-05-06 at 23:57 +0200, Ladislav Andel wrote:
> Hi O.,
> This will work only with one NAT involved in SIP dialog. If you have 
> both clients behind NAT then RTPproxy or Mediaproxy is necessary. Also, 
> your clients has to support active/passive direction attribute and be 
> able to read source IP:port address from the first RTP packet received.
> 
> Regards,
> Ladislav
> 
> 
> O. wrote:
> > Hi Kostas and samuel,
> >
> > In the case you are describing, using nathelper will replace the
> > rtpproxy or medianproxy? It looks to me that in this case the rtp will
> > be route in between the sip client, without any proxy. In the
> > configuration you mentioned the ser is on public IP?     
> > if this is the case it looks much better the proxy from the load
> > prospective.   
> >
> > thanks, 
> > O.
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers