[Users] OpenSER MySQL Updates - Weird

Norman Brandinger norm at goes.com
Tue Mar 28 21:40:53 CEST 2006


Douglas,

Below is Bogdan's previous response to you:

<snip>
all db_mods from 0 to 2 use mem cache - the difference is when the DB is
updated with changes from cache. in mod 1 the changes from cache are
immediately written into DB.

the only non-cache db mod is 3, but this is available only in the devel
branch - read carefully the docs to understand the implications of this mod.
</snip>

As you can see, he didn't say that db mode 3 is required in your 
situation.  He was just briefly explaining the option and steering you 
to the docs for more detailed information.  I don't think that the devel 
CVS branch is called OpenSER 1.1 but that's just a matter of semantics.

Anyway, getting back to your question:

If you google "multiple SER site:mail.iptel.org" you will find a 
discussion of your problem along with suggested solutions.

A thread along these lines is, for example: 
http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2003-November/003847.html

<from the above thread>
We have multiple SER servers all accesing the same database.  We had to
introduce a new "location" table for each instance of SER.  So for example
we have a main SER server which acceses the standard "location" table and we
have another SER as RTPProxy which uses a table called "location_proxy".  We
just created that custom table using the structure of the regular "location"
table.

Has been working great for us for several months.
</from the above thread>

I have found that searching mail.iptel.org will often provide answers to 
many questions.  Note that the above example thread was posted back in 2003.

Regards,
Norm



Douglas Garstang wrote:
> So, are you saying, based on the email you sent (which I just found) that Openser 1.1 and db_mode 3 are REQUIRED in order to support multiple OpenSER systems accessing a common MySQL database?
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:06 AM
>> To: Douglas Garstang
>> Cc: users at openser.org
>> Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER MySQL Updates - Weird
>>
>>
>> Doug,
>>
>> first of all,  if you do not get a reply, do not repost ...no 
>> one owes 
>> replies to no body.
>>
>> second...you got a reply..check carefully your emails.
>>
>> bogdan
>>
>> Douglas Garstang wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Posted this yesterday. Didn't get a reply...
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Bogdan, thanks for the reply. I'm don't quite understand. I'm 
>>>> using db_mode 1, which the docs say writes all updates 
>>>> immediately to the database. A 'openserctl ul show' still 
>>>> shows cached entries though. Why? Is db_mode 1 supposed to 
>>>> cache at all? Which db_mode should I use so that I can have 
>>>> two or more OpenSER systems safely accessing the same database?
>>>>
>>>> Douglas.
>>>>    
>>>>
>>>>         
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>   





More information about the sr-users mailing list