[Users] Route in INVITE

[Helge Waastad]

Hi,
sorry about that:
(I know I'm not always RFC compliant myself ;-) )

Route: <sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060;lr>


man, 13,.03.2006 kl. 17.17 +0100, skrev Klaus Darilion:
> Helge Waastad wrote:
> > Hi,
> > excellent.
> > Now I at least understood my problem.
> > 
> > I will have a loose_route problem in a "dispatcher/OBP scenario" since
> > the route header will not be the proxy it self, but the OBP/Dispatcher
> > address, hence a routing loop will occure...
> > (Probably Loose routing should be done at OBP layer...I just have to
> > figure it out.)
> 
> The the OBP is addressed using a pre-loaded route, it should remove the 
> Route header and forward it to the main proxy. Maybe the problem is the 
> route header:
> 
> Route:<OBP>;lr
> 
> Is the OBP really inside <> or is this just your formatting?
> 
> 
> klaus
> 
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > br hw
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > man, 13,.03.2006 kl. 17.35 +0200, skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu:
> >> by default, loose_route() function detects the pre-loaded route: if 
> >> there is only one Route hdr pointing to the server, it will be consumed 
> >> and loose_route() will return false. If more than one Route hdr is 
> >> present, the routing will be done as usual - function will consume the 
> >> Route and set the destination to the next Route - true is returned.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> bogdan
> >>
> >> Juha Heinanen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Helge Waastad writes:
> >>>
> >>>> I did modify my (a little-bit confused) loose route to loose route only
> >>>> INVITES/ACK with totags (has_totag). The rest should be going through
> >>>> the normal ACL procedures.
> >>> that won't help you with phones line nokia, which add Route header to
> >>> INITIAL request (which never have To tags).
> >>>
> >>> -- juha
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Users mailing list
> >>> Users at openser.org
> >>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> 
-- 
Helge Waastad
Senior Konsulent
Smartnet