[Users] Daemons and killing processes...
Helge Waastad
helge at smartnet.no
Fri Mar 10 16:51:54 CET 2006
Hi,
bt is as follows:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x08098ebf in qm_free ()
#1 0x007aaf97 in update_contacts (_m=0x814f308, _r=0xb61920d8,
_c=0x8139548) at save.c:627
#2 0x007ab67d in save_real (_m=0x814f308, _t=0xb618fe88, doreply=1) at
save.c:662
#3 0x0805087b in do_action ()
#4 0x08051a0c in do_action ()
#5 0x08051bd2 in run_actions ()
#6 0x0807534f in receive_msg ()
#7 0x08092ca3 in udp_rcv_loop ()
#8 0x08065056 in main_loop ()
#9 0x08065835 in main ()
(gdb)
I'm not sure how to get even more memory debugs.
br hw
fre, 10,.03.2006 kl. 11.44 +0200, skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu:
> Hi,
>
> you mean that after first register the proxy dies? if so, it seams like
> a mem corruption to me...any logs? the memory debugger messages are very
> useful.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Helge Waastad wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > this is the output after compiling with the extra options.
> >
> > Anyway, that really killed the daemon..
> > One register, and it dumps.
> >
> > br hw
> >
> >
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x002727a2 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> > #1 0x00338d8c in sched_yield () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #2 0x00e4b100 in lock_udomain (_d=0xb618fe58) at ../../fastlock.h:166
> > #3 0x00e4db9a in mem_timer_udomain (_d=0xb618fe58) at udomain.c:677
> > #4 0x00e47f05 in synchronize_all_udomains () at dlist.c:488
> > #5 0x00e50a15 in destroy () at ul_mod.c:285
> > #6 0x08085dce in destroy_modules ()
> > #7 0x080638ba in cleanup ()
> > #8 0x080644f6 in handle_sigs ()
> > #9 0x08065215 in main_loop ()
> > #10 0x08065835 in main ()
> >
> >
> > Mvh,
> > Helge Waastad
> > Senior Engineer
> > Smartnet
> > tlf: 67830017
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan at voice-system.ro]
> > Sent: Tue 3/7/2006 9:17 PM
> > To: Helge Waastad
> > Cc: Andreas Granig; users at openser.org
> > Subject: Re: [Users] Daemons and killing processes...
> >
> > Hi Helge,
> >
> > I suspect a problem related to memory - the remaining process may cycle
> > with no control trying to print the mem status (which may be broken).
> >
> > to see if it;s the case, compile mem debug support (remove F_MALLOC and
> > add DBG_QM_MALLOC and recompile everything)
> >
> > regards,
> > bogdan
> >
> > Helge Waastad wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >I've been waiting fo 12 min now, and are preparing to put then kettle on
> > >to fix me a cup of coffee...I guess I have time enough :-)
> > >
> > >...is there a "debugging" manual avaliable? I guess it would be nice
> > >having feedback on the dev list already including the backtrace?
> > >
> > >
> > >BTW, the output for the hanging process is:
> > >
> > >(gdb) bt
> > >#0 0x080a0ab9 in fm_status ()
> > >#1 0x080663e2 in sig_usr ()
> > >#2 <signal handler called>
> > >#3 0x007787a0 in _dl_sysinfo_int80 () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> > >#4 0x008594d1 in recvfrom () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > >#5 0x08098a87 in udp_rcv_loop ()
> > >#6 0x08066df2 in main_loop ()
> > >#7 0x08067585 in main ()
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >tir, 07,.03.2006 kl. 18.56 +0100, skrev Andreas Granig:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Helge Waastad wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Hi,
> > >>>I have somewhat trouble to get a core dump from the init script.
> > >>>I get core dumps when I run it in shell, but not as init script.
> > >>>
> > >>>I'll try to be creative later this evening.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>The backtrace for the processes looks like this:
> > >>
> > >>#0 0x0808eb0d in fm_status (qm=0x811d940) at mem/f_malloc.c:515
> > >>#1 0x08065fee in sig_usr (signo=1077141592) at main.c:565
> > >>#2 <signal handler called>
> > >>#3 0x4010d534 in recvfrom () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > >>#4 0x08089433 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:415
> > >>#5 0x08063de4 in main_loop () at main.c:919
> > >>#6 0x0806522e in main (argc=1, argv=0xbfbc54e4) at main.c:1472
> > >>
> > >>But it shuts down after quite some (long) time...
> > >>
> > >>Andy
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list