[Serusers] first posting, got a few problems..

[nick]

Greger V. Teigre wrote:
> Nick,
> We're running ser-0.9.7-pre (at onsip.org) under CentOs and kernel 
> 2.6.9-34.EL. No problems whatsoever. It's Intel, though.
> g-)
> 
> nick wrote:
> 
>>
>>>>
>>>>> To explain my situation, I've got a dual opteron 246 system with 
>>>>> 1gig of ram and 2 80gig disks in raid1 (software raid), I'm running 
>>>>> CentOS 4.3 x86_64 with kernel  2.6.9-34.ELsmp I'm running ser 
>>>>> 0.9.6-6 (the -6 may just be an artifact from the fedora core rpm.. 
>>>>> I dunno) (compiled from ser-0.9.6_src.tar.gz)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since no one seems to makes rpms for redhat or centOS  (the same 
>>>>> thing obviously) I went and made my own. I grabbed a fedora core 6 
>>>>> src rpm, and modified the specfile to my own liking (basically I 
>>>>> took out the stuff related to postgres), the compile went fine, as 
>>>>> far as I can tell, no errors were big enough to stop the 
>>>>> compilation at least, and the rpms installed just fine. All the 
>>>>> modules are in the right place, and my ser.cfg seems to be correct 
>>>>> (I don't get any more errors during startup), however, I do get a 
>>>>> segfault :(
>>>>>
>>>>> here's the attached output from /log/messages
>>>>>
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver ser: Listening on
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver ser:              udp: 192.168.1.93 
>>>>> [192.168.1.93]:5060
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver ser:              tcp: 192.168.1.93 
>>>>> [192.168.1.93]:5060
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver ser: Aliases:
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver ser:              tcp: pc-00093:5060
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver ser:              udp: pc-00093:5060
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver ser:
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver kernel: ser[3682]: segfault at 
>>>>> 0000000000000000 rip 0000002a9589ef92 rsp 0000007fbffff850 error 4
>>>>> Jun 23 12:20:18 sipserver ser: ser startup succeeded
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously ser isn't running, does anyone have any idea where I can 
>>>>> start looking to find out what dies/died/went wrong with the compile?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Nick
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> OK, got the core dumps working did a gdb -c on the first coredump file
>>>
>>> here's the output after typing bt:
>>>
>>>
>>> [root at sipserver /]# gdb -c core.3658
>>> GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.96rh)
>>> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>>> GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and 
>>> you are
>>> welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain 
>>> conditions.
>>> Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
>>> There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for 
>>> details.
>>> This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu".
>>> Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/ser'.
>>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>>> #0  0x0000002a9589ef92 in ?? ()
>>> (gdb) bt
>>> #0  0x0000002a9589ef92 in ?? ()
>>> #1  0x0000000000000010 in ?? ()
>>> #2  0x0000002a95681686 in ?? ()
>>> #3  0x0000002a95782c40 in ?? ()
>>> #4  0x0000000000000af0 in ?? ()
>>> #5  0x000000000000000c in ?? ()
>>> #6  0x000000000000000c in ?? ()
>>> #7  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>
>>
>>
>> Ok, to see if it might be a problem with the kernel, I just grabbed 
>> the latest from the servers, it's now 2.6.9-34.0.1.ELsmp, but it 
>> segfaults anyways, although the backtrace is a bit different:
>>
>>
>>
>> [root at sipserver /]# gdb -c core.3095
>> Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/ser'.
>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>> #0  0x0000002a95785f92 in ?? ()
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0  0x0000002a95785f92 in ?? ()
>> #1  0x0000000000000400 in ?? ()
>> #2  0x0000002a95568686 in ?? ()
>> #3  0x0000002a95669c40 in ?? ()
>> #4  0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
> 


So this is all the help I can expect??

Sigh, off to build myself an earlier 9, and possibly an 8 series rpm :(