[Serusers] Mediaproxy problem - how to disable P2P rtp connection

Tue Jun 20 10:53:04 CEST 2006

Hi,

I have found the problem. (in fact it was not a problem)
The client was using the alternate media connection information which is peer-2-peer.
How can I prevent P2P connection  ? 
I need to remove "media attribute (a): alt:1" from the SIP INVITE messages, but how ?

Thanks,
ilker

________________________________

From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:13 PM
To: serusers at iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy problem

Hi,

Please help me with the following problem.
Do I need SRV dns records even if I don't use load balancing ?

Thanks,
ilker

________________________________

From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 4:31 PM
To: serusers at iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Mediaproxy problem

Hi,

I just installed mediaproxy 1.7.2
At this time, I am not interested in using more than one rtp server for loadbalancing.
That's why I didn't add any DNS SRV records to my DNS.
Would that be a problem ?

If it's not a problem, then what's the problem described below?

When I call from one client to the other one, I see that the SDP messages are modified as required (media connection infromation is changed to the media proxy server)
But after first few RTP packets all RTP is routed to the alternate connection which is direct connection to the client (peer-2-peer)

Thanks for your comments,
ilker

C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> 
Hi,

Please help me with the following problem.
Do I need SRV dns records even if I don't use load balancing ?

Thanks,
ilker

________________________________

From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 4:31 PM
To: serusers at iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Mediaproxy problem

Hi,

I just installed mediaproxy 1.7.2
At this time, I am not interested in using more than one rtp server for loadbalancing.
That's why I didn't add any DNS SRV records to my DNS.
Would that be a problem ?

If it's not a problem, then what's the problem described below?

When I call from one client to the other one, I see that the SDP messages are modified as required (media connection infromation is changed to the media proxy server)
But after first few RTP packets all RTP is routed to the alternate connection which is direct connection to the client (peer-2-peer)

Thanks for your comments,
ilker

C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> 
Hi,

I have found the problem. (in fact it was not a problem)
The client was using the alternate media connection information which is peer-2-peer.
How can I prevent P2P connection  ? 
I need to remove "media attribute (a): alt:1" from the SIP INVITE messages, but how ?

Thanks,
ilker

________________________________

From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:13 PM
To: serusers at iptel.org
Subject: RE: [Serusers] Mediaproxy problem

Hi,

Please help me with the following problem.
Do I need SRV dns records even if I don't use load balancing ?

Thanks,
ilker

________________________________

From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 4:31 PM
To: serusers at iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Mediaproxy problem

Hi,

I just installed mediaproxy 1.7.2
At this time, I am not interested in using more than one rtp server for loadbalancing.
That's why I didn't add any DNS SRV records to my DNS.
Would that be a problem ?

If it's not a problem, then what's the problem described below?

When I call from one client to the other one, I see that the SDP messages are modified as required (media connection infromation is changed to the media proxy server)
But after first few RTP packets all RTP is routed to the alternate connection which is direct connection to the client (peer-2-peer)

Thanks for your comments,
ilker

C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> 
Hi,

Please help me with the following problem.
Do I need SRV dns records even if I don't use load balancing ?

Thanks,
ilker

________________________________

From: serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 4:31 PM
To: serusers at iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Mediaproxy problem

Hi,

I just installed mediaproxy 1.7.2
At this time, I am not interested in using more than one rtp server for loadbalancing.
That's why I didn't add any DNS SRV records to my DNS.
Would that be a problem ?

If it's not a problem, then what's the problem described below?

When I call from one client to the other one, I see that the SDP messages are modified as required (media connection infromation is changed to the media proxy server)
But after first few RTP packets all RTP is routed to the alternate connection which is direct connection to the client (peer-2-peer)

Thanks for your comments,
ilker

 <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/03090E00/07074E03/00090C49/0020195222.jpg>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa,  icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz  ve  tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz.  Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. 
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential  information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however,  sender  cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20060620/34c726b4/attachment.htm>