[Serusers] DNS SRV sending call to second priority
Jiri Kuthan
jiri at iptel.org
Mon Jun 5 19:29:35 CEST 2006
indeed -- that's currently an unsupported feature being worked on.
-jiri
At 17:46 05/06/2006, Paul Antinori (pantinor) wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C688B7.3390EF42"
>
>I am using DNS SRV query for stateful routing of calls like in my script below. I see the SRV query is going through from SER.
>
>My problem is that when the call times out to priority 1 A record, SER does not send it to priority 2.
>
>Thanks for help.
>
>vxml-1 IN A 10.86.xxx.1
>vxml-2 IN A 10.86.xxx.2
>vxml-3 IN A 10.86.xxx.3
>
>; Priority Weight Port Target
>_sip._tcp.vxml.pats.cisco.com. SRV 1 1 5060 vxml-1.pats.cisco.com.
> SRV 2 1 5060 vxml-2.pats.cisco.com.
> SRV 3 1 5060 vxml-3.pats.cisco.com.
>_sip._udp.vxml.pats.cisco.com. SRV 1 1 5060 vxml-1.pats.cisco.com.
> SRV 2 1 5060 vxml-2.pats.cisco.com.
> SRV 3 1 5060 vxml-3.pats.cisco.com.
>
>route{
>
> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
> break;
> };
>
> if (uri=~"^sip:7") {
> log(1, "Found 7*\n");
> rewritehostport("vxml.pats.cisco.com");
> route(1);
> break;
> }
>
> if (uri=~"^sip:9") {
> log(1, "Found 9*\n");
> rewritehostport("ringtone.pats.cisco.com");
> route(1);
> break;
> }
>
> log(1,"Could Not Match DN to a Route\n");
>
> route(1);
>}
>
>route[1]
>{
>
> #use "t_relay" for STATEFUL forwarding
> #for STATELESS forwarding use this syntax: forward(10.86.xx.xx,5060);
>
> if (!t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> };
>}
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>Serusers at lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
More information about the sr-users
mailing list