[Serusers] error configuration file

Andrey Kouprianov andrey.kouprianov at gmail.com
Tue Jul 25 05:59:49 CEST 2006 

Im not sure what the problem is. However, it's not just the uri.so you
have to change to uri_db.so, when migrating from 0.8.x to 0.9.x. There
are more things like:

1. vm.so module does not exist in 0.8.x anymore. Been moved to tm.so
2. All the operands such as "&" or "|" must be changed to "&&" and
"||" respectively
3. Negation such as in   if( ! value1=value2)   will now be    if
(value1 != value2)
4. pa.so module has no effect in 0.9.x, because it will always NOTIFY
with status "closed" for anyone who subscribes to SER.
5. There might be more, but I dont remember now.

If you've sent your ser.cfg file, maybe someone could help, because
sometimes it's difficult to see the error w/o seeing config file.

  Andrey.

On 7/24/06, Asep Saifudin <aseps2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andrey,
> I have try ser.cfg on Onsip.org but not meet with my plan.
> Btw, I have running SER 0.8.14 on my Linux machine and then the ser.cfg file
> I copy & paste to my new SER 0.9.6 (and I have change uri to uri_db) machine
> and then when I type ser -c I got message error  in /var/log/messages like
> this :
> Jul 24 21:17:17 sangbintang kernel: pid 51240 (ser), uid 0: exited on signal
> 11 (core dumped).
>
> And then I type serctl start, I got message like these :
> Jul 24 21:17:46 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51248]: Maxfwd module-
> initializing
> Jul 24 21:17:46 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51248]: db_url=0x82091a0
> Jul 24 21:17:46 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51248]: db_url=
> mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser
> Jul 24 21:17:46 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51248]: db_url.len=31
> Jul 24 21:17:46 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51248]:
> pa_domain=sip.handhelds.org
> Jul 24 21:17:46 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51248]: pa_mod: use_db=1
> db_url.s=mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser pa_domain=sip.hand
> helds.org
> Jul 24 21:17:46 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51248]: pa_mod_init done
> Jul 24 21:17:59 sangbintang kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from
> 253 to 200 packets/sec
> Jul 24 21:18:01 sangbintang kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from
> 233 to 200 packets/sec
> Jul 24 21:18:02 sangbintang kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from
> 262 to 200 packets/sec
> Jul 24 21:18:04 sangbintang kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from
> 283 to 200 packets/sec
> Jul 24 21:18:24 sangbintang kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from
> 253 to 200 packets/sec
> Jul 24 21:18:25 sangbintang kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from
> 233 to 200 packets/sec
> Jul 24 21:18:27 sangbintang kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from
> 262 to 200 packets/sec
> Jul 24 21:18:28 sangbintang kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from
> 283 to 200 packets/sec
> Jul 24 21:19:04 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51250]: TESTING TO SEE IF IT
> IS FROM LOCAL NAT.
> Jul 24 21:19:04 sangbintang /usr/local/sbin/ser[51250]: REPLYING DOMAIN NOT
> SERVED HERE.
>
> What's the meaning of them cos I still got registration problem ? (it's hard
> for me as a newbie in SER)  :((
>
>
> 2006/7/24, Andrey Kouprianov <andrey.kouprianov at gmail.com>:
> > The sample conf file for PSTN gateway can be found with getting
> > started document on onsip.org ftp site. Plz, check.
> >
> > On 7/24/06, Asep Saifudin <aseps2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andrey,
> > > I have install SER 0.9.6.x in my FreeBSD 6.0 and my configuration until
> now
> > > still failed (core dumped and my Xten won't register to SER even I have
> > > account in subscriber table.
> > > Do you have (or anybody have) sample running configuratin of ser.cfg for
> SER
> > > 0.9.6.x which I can try/use on my SER server ? my scheme is simple, my
> SER
> > > can call inter SER-account and call to PSTN/Mobile via my quintum
> gateway.
> > > Hopefully you have sample running ser.cfg file
> > >
> > > ~Asep
> > >
> > > 2006/7/24, Andrey Kouprianov <andrey.kouprianov at gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > Thing is, 0.8.14 doesnt have uri_db.so module (only uri.so), which was
> > > introduced  in version 0.9.x. That's why it would not work.
> > >
> > > On 7/24/06, Giuseppe Parlato <gparlato at tnet.it> wrote:
> > > > If I unload uri.so and but I load uri_db.so I get the following error:
> > > > bind_dbmod: Module sql does not export db_use_table function
> > > > ERROR: mod_init(): Can't bind database module
> > > > init_mod(): Error while initializing module usrloc
> > > > WARNING:fm_free: free(0) called
> > > >
> > > > However I dont get error no more on this line:
> > > > modparam("auth_db|domain|group|uri|usrloc", "db_url",
> > > > " sql://serro:psw@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/ser")
> > > >
> > > > ???
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Giuseppe
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Giuseppe Parlato" < gparlato at tnet.it>
> > > > To: "Andrey Kouprianov" <andrey.kouprianov at gmail.com>
> > > > Cc: < serusers at iptel.org >
> > > > Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 8:11 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] error configuration file
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Before (0.8.14) in conf file uri_db.so was not loaded but everything
> > > > > worked the same.
> > > > > In my conf file I had:
> > > modparam("auth_db|domain|group|uri|usrloc",
> > > > > "db_url", "sql://serro:psw@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/ser"), but if I upgrade
> to
> > > > > 0.9.6 I get an error on this line.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ..I'm using freeradius
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > Giuseppe
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Andrey Kouprianov" < andrey.kouprianov at gmail.com>
> > > > > To: < serusers at iptel.org>
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 12:02 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] error configuration file
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>I think it's the check_from() that gives the error. Check if you've
> > > > >> loaded uri_db.so module...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 7/21/06, Klaus Darilion < klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
> > > > >>> maybe && instead of &  ?????
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> this error message also happens if you forget to close all if
> blocks
> > > > >>> (watch out for missing '}' )
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> regards
> > > > >>> klaus
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Giuseppe Parlato wrote:
> > > > >>> > Hi.. I got the following error when I try to start ser:
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > parse error (329,55-56): unknown command, missing loadmodule?
> > > > >>> > ERROR: bad config file (1 errors)
> > > > >>> > ser startup failed
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > so on my configuration file the problem is this here:
> > > > >>> > } else if ((method=="INVITE") & !check_from()) {
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > I was using ser 0.8.14 then upgraded to 0.9.6, but configuration
> > > file
> > > > >>> > has not been changed. The same file worked on 0.8.14 version.
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> >
> > > > >>> > help please
> > > > >>> > Giuseppe
> > > > >>> > _______________________________________________
> > > > >>> > Serusers mailing list
> > > > >>> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > >>> >
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > > >>> Serusers mailing list
> > > > >>> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > >>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> Serusers mailing list
> > > > >> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > >> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date:
> > > > >> 21/07/2006
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Serusers mailing list
> > > > > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/395 - Release Date:
> > > 21/07/2006
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
>
>

More information about the sr-users mailing list